Table 1.
Patients with EPIC-26 (n = 534) | Patients with EPIC-50 (n = 324) | p value* | |
---|---|---|---|
Characteristics | |||
Age at recruitment, years, mean (SD) | 68.1 (8.0) | 67.9 (8.0) | 0.652 |
Tumoral stage, n (%) | |||
Tx | 8 (1.5%) | 1 (0.3%) | 0.346 |
T0 | 1 (0.2%) | 1 (0.3%) | |
T1 | 250 (46.0%) | 162 (50.2%) | |
T2 | 184 (33.9%) | 102 (31.6%) | |
T3 | 97 (17.9%) | 57 (17.6%) | |
T4 | 3 (0.6%) | 0 (0.0%) | |
PSA, mean (SD) | 11.1 (13.8) | 9.4 (9.0) | 0.049 |
Gleason score, mean (SD) | 7.1 (0.9) | 6.8 (1.0) | < 0.001 |
D’Amico tumoral risk, n (%) | |||
Low | 94 (17.4%) | 102 (31.6%) | < 0.001 |
Intermediate | 249 (46.1%) | 128 (39.6%) | |
High | 197 (36.5%) | 93 (28.8%) | |
Initial primary treatment | |||
External radiotherapy, n (%) | 282 (51.9%) | 181 (55.9%) | < 0.001 |
Radical prostatectomy, n (%) | 185 (34.1%) | 83 (25.6%) | |
Brachytherapy as monotherapy, n (%) | 38 (7.0%) | 44 (13.6%) | |
Active surveillance, n (%) | 29 (5.3%) | 3 (0.9%) | |
Focal brachytherapy, n (%) | 9 (1.7%) | 13 (4.0%) | |
Distribution of the EPIC scores | |||
Urinary incontinence | |||
Observed range | 0–100 | 0–100 | |
Floor and ceiling effect (%) | 0.9%; 54.1% | 1.9%; 62.7% | |
Mean (SD) | 77.9 (28.2) | 81.5 (27.5) | |
Cronbach’s alpha | 0.90 | 0.91 | |
Urinary irritative/obstructive | |||
Observed range | 0–100 | 7.1–100 | |
Floor and ceiling effect (%) | 0.7%; 42.5% | 0.0%; 36.4% | |
Mean (SD) | 80.6 (22.5) | 84.5 (17.7) | |
Cronbach’s alpha | 0.67 | 0.63 | |
Bowel | |||
Observed range | 0–100 | 28.6–100 | |
Floor and ceiling effect (%) | 0.4%; 66.1% | 0.0%; 61.7% | |
Mean (SD) | 88.1 (21.2) | 92.0 (14.1) | |
Cronbach’s alpha | 0.84 | 0.87 | |
Sexual | |||
Observed range | 0–87.5 | 0–90.4 | |
Floor and ceiling effect (%) | 1.8%; 0.0% | 0.3%; 0.0% | |
Mean (SD) | 34.8 (27.4) | 43.6 (19.9) | |
Cronbach’s alpha | 0.86 | 0.88 | |
Hormonal | |||
Observed range | 0–100 | 4.6–100 | |
Floor and ceiling effect (%) | 1.3%; 38.9% | 0.0%; 29.9% | |
Mean (SD) | 74.2 (28.0) | 82.2 (19.7) | |
Cronbach’s alpha | 0.78 | 0.84 |
*p-values were estimated with Chi-square test or unpaired Student’s t test