Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 13;41(12):3723–3730. doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04640-4

Table 1.

p-Tm:YAG ablation efficiency for stone dust from human urinary stones

Stone composition Laser setting (200 J@10W) One-way ANOVA for laser settings within each stone composition
0.1 J × 100 Hz 0.4 J × 25 Hz 2.0 J × 5 Hz

Ablated stone dust mass (mg)

(95% CI)

COM

8.4

(5.1–11.7)

11.8

(7.9–15.8)

13.9

(8.2–19.6)

p = 0.08
UA

8.1

(3.9–12.3)

9.3

(5.7–12.9)

12.1

(9.5–14.8)

p = 0.11
Student’s t test for each laser setting p = 0.89 p = 0.22 p = 0.45

Ablation mass efficiency (mg/J)

(95% CI)

COM

0.042

(0.025–0.058)

0.059

(0.039–0.079)

0.070

(0.041–0.098)

p = 0.08
UA

0.041

(0.019–0.062)

0.046

(0.028–0.064)

0.061

(0.047–0.074)

p = 0.11
Student’s t test for each laser setting p = 0.89 p = 0.22 p = 0.45

Ablation volume efficiency* (mm3/J)

(95% CI)

COM

0.021

(0.012–0.029)

0.029

(0.019–0.039)

0.034

(0.020–0.048)

p = 0.08
UA

0.026

(0.013–0.040)

0.030

(0.018–0.042)

0.039

(0.031–0.048)

p = 0.11
Student’s t test for each laser setting p = 0.35 p = 0.86 p = 0.42 -

*Volume estimated using prior reported stone density of natural human urinary stones[36]