Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 13;41(12):3723–3730. doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04640-4

Table 2.

p-Tm:YAG energy consumption for stone dust from human urinary stones

Mean measurement Stone composition Laser setting (200 J@10W) One-way ANOVA for laser settings within each stone composition
0.1 J × 100 Hz 0.4 J × 25 Hz 2.0 J × 5 Hz
Energy per ablated mass (J/mg) (95% CI) COM

26.1

(14.7–37.5)

18.2

(10.8–25.6)

16.8

(5.4–28.1)

p = 0.20
UA

32.2

(2.7–61.8)

23.0

(15.5–30.5)

17.0

(12.4–21.6)

p = 0.27
Student’s t test for each laser setting p = 0.61 p = 0.24 p = 0.95 –
Energy per estimated ablated volume* (J/mm3) (95% CI) COM

53.2

(29.9–76.5)

37.0

(21.9–52.2)

34.1

(11.0–57.3)

p = 0.20
UA

49.8

(4.2–95.5)

35.6

(24.0–47.2)

26.3

(19.2–33.4)

p = 0.27
Student’s t test for each laser setting p = 0.86 p = 0.84 p = 0.40 –

*Volume estimated using prior reported stone density of natural human urinary stones[36]