Skip to main content
. 2023 Dec 2;13:21269. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-48533-3

Table 3.

Fatty acid composition (% of total) of European sea bass fillet fed the two experimental feeds (n = 3 cages per diet group).

Fatty acids Conventional diet (%) Low marine protein diet (%)
14:0 2.63 3.36
14:1 0.04 0.05
15:0 0.28 0.31
16:0 16.80 17.19
16:1n-9 0.54 0.46
16:1n-7 4.28 5.57
17:0 0.29 0.27
17:1n-7 0.23 0.21
18:0 3.98 3.76
18:1n-9 31.51 26.30
18:1n-7 3.29 3.23
18:2n-6 12.22a 9.58b
18:3n-3 3.70 2.68
18:4n-3 0.81 1.41
20:0 0.24 0.21
20:1n-11 0.33 0.55
20:1n-9 3.39 4.88
20:2n-6 0.94 0.67
20:3n-6 0.16 0.12
20:4n-6 (ARA) 0.55a 0.48b
20:3n-3 0.27 0.21
20:4n-3 0.51 0.50
20:5n-3 (EPA) 3.95a 5.15b
22:0 0.09 0.08
22:1n-11 1.58 4.12
22:1n-9 0.45 0.61
22:6n-3 (DHA) 6.53a 7.59b
24:1n-9 0.43 0.46
Total
 Saturated 24.30 25.18
 Monounsaturated 46.06 46.43
 n-9 36.32 32.71
 n-6 13.87a 10.84b
 n-3 15.76a 17.54b
 EPA 3.95a 5.15b
 DHA 6.53a 7.59b

Different letters in the same line indicate significant differences between diet groups (ANOVA followed by Tukey’s HSD; p < 0.05).

ARA arachidonic acid, EPA eicosapentaenoic acid, DHA docosahexaenoic acid.