Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 1;66(9):1971–1978. doi: 10.1007/s10840-023-01512-0

Table 3.

LAAO procedural characteristics and outcomes

Group I with CIED (%) Group II without CIED (%) p value
Total number of patients 31 243
Procedural success rate 27 (87.1) 232 (95.5) 0.075
Procedure type
  Stand-alone LAAO 23 (74.2) 110 (45.3) 0.002
  Combined CA with LAAO 8 (25.8) 133 (54.7)
Device type
  WATCHMAN 2.5 25 (80.6) 189 (77.8) 0.792
  WATCHMAN FLX 4 (12.9) 42 (17.3)
  Amplatzer Amulet 2 (6.5) 12 (4.9)
Duration procedure in minutes, mean (SD)
  Stand-alone LAAO
    Venous puncture–TSP 10: 40 ± 05: 23 12: 56 ± 10: 16 0.319
    Total procedure time 53: 52 ± 20: 50 53: 27 ± 21: 48 0.934
    Fluoroscopy time 09: 59 ± 05: 53 08: 48 ± 04: 54 0.358
  Combined CA with LAAO
    Venous puncture–TSP 08: 00 ± 03: 52 09: 35 ± 07: 35 0.583
    Total procedure time 1: 45: 00 ± 29: 11 1: 47: 31 ± 30: 11 0.818
    Fluoroscopy time 13: 08 ± 04: 50 15: 37 ± 05: 56 0.281
Radiation exposure (DAP Gy·cm2)
  Stand-alone LAAO 21.5 (12.3–36.9) 20.0 (11.0–33.0) 0.381
  Combined CA with LAAO 29.0 (18.0–38.0) 37.0 (25.0–57.3) 0.157

CA, catheter ablation; CIED, cardiac implantable electronic device; DAP, dose area product; LA, left atrium; LAA, left atrial appendage; LAAO, left atrial appendage occlusion; NSVT, non-sustained ventricular tachycardia; SD, standard deviation; TIA, transient ischemic attack; TOE, transesophageal echography; TSP, transseptal puncture