Skip to main content
. 2023 Nov 7;9(11):e21758. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21758

Table 3.

Hypothesis testing and controlling variables – Study 1.


Paths
Model 1


Model 2

Hypothesis Testing
SRE SE t-value R2 SRE SE t-value R2
H1 Pro-Environmental Attitude → Pro-Environmental Behavior .593 .040 12,769*** 35,2 .580 .039 12,724*** 39,4 Supported
Gender → Pro-Environmental Behavior .050 .089 1825
Age → Pro-Environmental Behavior .235 .002 8285***

Fit Model 1: χ2(36) = 116,441 (p < .001); χ2/df = 3234; CFI = 0.991; TLI = 0.986; NFI = 0.987; RMSEA = 0.047 (CI = 0.037-0.056); SRMR = 0.0273.

Fit Model 2: χ2(57) = 254,492 (p < .001); χ2/df = 4465; CFI = 0.978; TLI = 0.965; NFI = 0.972; RMSEA = 0.058 (CI = 0.051-0.065).

***p < .001.