Skip to main content
. 2023 Nov 20;14:1295722. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1295722

Table 3.

Effects of different fertilizer treatments on agronomic characters, quality and yield of cotton.

Parameters Treatments
T1 T2 T3 T4 T5
Plant height 63.57 ± 12.28a 60.93 ± 8.04a 66.00 ± 9.46a 67.07 ± 10.97a 66.40 ± 6.49a
Number of blades 12.87 ± 1.46b 13.07 ± 1.80a 14.00 ± 1.65a 14.07 ± 1.28a 13.93 ± 1.91a
Stem diameter 9.14 ± 0.88a 8.91 ± 1.11b 9.65 ± 1.33a 9.71 ± 1.15a 9.87 ± 1.51a
SPAD 51.0 ± 9.64a 54.39 ± 12.09a 49.81 ± 11.95a 50.95 ± 14.44a 53.78 ± 14.22a
Boll number per plant 5.55 ± 1.35b 9.89 ± 0.70a 9.33 ± 0.67a 10.45 ± 3.24a 10.11 ± 2.37a
Boll weight 5.42 ± 0.27a 5.77 ± 0.20a 5.68 ± 0.11a 5.80 ± 0.18a 5.70 ± 0.35a
Lint percent 44.64 ± 0.38a 44.39 ± 0.54a 44.11 ± 0.16a 44.52 ± 0.43a 44.12 ± 0.53a
Raw cotton yield 309.47 ± 3.30d 427.68 ± 8.83c 418.43 ± 5.44c 450.2 ± .83b 479.43 ± 9.48a

Values indicate mean ± SE (n = 3). Different superscript letters in the columns represent significant differences among fertilizer treatments according to one-way ANOVA (Duncan’s test, p < 0.05). The abbreviations T1, T2, T3, T4, and T5 are as defined in the footnote to Table 1.