Skip to main content
. 2023 Nov 20;14:1287899. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1287899

Table 5.

Effect of Lactobacillus plantarum supplementation on microbial relative abundance components in the ileum of layer chicks (14 days of age)1.

Items2 Treatments SEM p-value
Control LPS LPM/LPS
Phylum (%)
Firmicutes 91.02 93.63 79.66 2.56 0.053
Proteobacteria 5.58 5.23 6.60 1.35 0.920
Actinobacteria 2.97ab 0.83b 12.31a 2.04 0.041
Genus (%)
Romboutsia 57.68a 55.10a 18.98b 5.05 0.001
Turicibacter 5.71 16.21 20.43 3.72 0.262
Enterococcus 15.34 7.63 14.11 2.22 0.331
Escherichia-Shigella 4.66 4.78 4.73 1.23 0.999
Corynebacterium 2.55 0.61 11.73 2.03 0.048
Aerococcus 3.25 1.68 8.38 1.49 0.161
Eisenbergiella 0.78 1.81 1.92 0.60 0.715
Staphylococcus 0.79 1.69 2.06 0.42 0.475
norank_f__norank_o__RF39 0.82 1.45 1.70 0.34 0.567
norank_f__norank_o__Clostridia_UCG-014 1.17 0.93 0.74 0.21 0.735

1Data are the mean of 7 replicates (1 chick each replicate).2LPS, Lipopolysaccharide; LPM, Lactobacillus plantarum in microencapsulation; LPM/LPS, LPM supplementation after LPS injection.a,bValues within a row with no common superscripts differ significantly (p < 0.05).