Skip to main content
. 2023 Dec;47(6):352–356. doi: 10.1192/bjb.2022.87

Table 1.

Participant ECG interpretation accuracy

Normal ECG, good quality Atrial fibrillation, good quality Complete heart block, good quality Prolonged QT, good quality Normal ECG, poor quality
12L 6L 12L 6L 12L 6L 12L 6L 12L 6L
Stated quality was good, n/r (%) 123/152 (81) 141/152 (93) 132/152 (87) 57/157 (36) 124/164 (76) 134/160 (84) 150/157 (96) 130/146 (89) 144/156 (92) 113/135 (84)
Correctly identified ECG normal or abnormal, n/r (%) 92/152 (61) 121/152 (81) 150/153 (98) 148/156 (95) 152/161 (94) 150/156, (96) 138/155 (89) 122/144 (85) 6/155 (4) 34/134 (25)
Interpreted ECG correctly, n/r (%) 92/152 (61) 121/152 (81) 84/150 (56) 72/149 (46) 31/161 (20) 37/160 (23) 77/155 (50) 65/146 (45) 6/155 (4) 34/134 (25)
Would prescribe antipsychotics, n/r (%) 94/145 (65) 116/145 (79) 23/151 (15) 19/158 (12) 21/156 (13) 14/158 (9) 24/142 (15) 24/142 (17) 12/156 (8) 50/132 (38)
Would prescribe AChEI, n/r (%) 55/84 (65) 65/83 (78) 18/84 (21) 13/92 (14) 6/92 (7) 12/89 (13) 15/89 (16) 12/83 (19) 8/90 (9) 3/79 (39)

r, number of total responses to the question.