Table 2.
Correlation between predicting variables and exposure to SEIM
| Variable | (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | (8) | (9) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exposure to SEIM (1) | 1 | ||||||||
| Age (2) | .09* | 1 | |||||||
| Internet use (3) | .22*** | –.05 | 1 | ||||||
| Puberty (4) | –.01 | –.11* | –.01 | 1 | |||||
| Life satisfaction (5) | –.04 | –.01 | –.01 | .06 | 1 | ||||
| Perceived realism of SEIM (6) | .30*** | .01 | .06 | –.06 | .08 | 1 | |||
| Family cohesion (7) | –.16** | –.10* | –.19*** | .03 | .04 | .08*** | 1 | ||
| Sensation seeking (8) | .38*** | .07 | .09* | –.05 | –.06 | .04*** | –.30*** | 1 | |
| Parental monitoring (9) | –.06 | .18*** | –.10* | –.14** | .12 | –.06*** | .41 | –.02 | 1 |
Note. *p < .05, **p < .01, ***p < .001.