Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 6;89:259–268. doi: 10.5114/jhk/168308

Table 2.

Physiotherapy evidence database (PEDro) scale ratings.

References Items* Total (from a possible maximal of 10)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Abe et al. (2005) 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 6
Behringer et al. (2016) 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 5
Cook et al. (2014) 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 4
de Oliveira et al. (2015) 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 4
Horiuchi et al. (2018) 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 4
Kakhak et al. (2020) 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 6
Madarame et al. (2011) 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 3
Manimmanakor et al. (2013) 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 5
Scott et al. (2016) 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 6
Shalamzari et al. (2020) 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 5
Taylor et al. (2016) 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 6
Yang et al. (2022) 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 5
Median score = 5

Note: * a detailed explanation for each PEDro scale item can be accessed at https://pedro.org.au/wp-content/uploads/PEDro_scale.pdf (access for this review: August 26, 2022).