Skip to main content
. 2023 Dec 4;21:158. doi: 10.18332/tid/174407

Table 3.

Convergence club process in cigarette sales by brand (in packs), 2005–2010

Club Number of brands β S.E. t-statistic p a Brands (N=74)
1 12 0.034 0.19 0.18 0.5714 Marlboro, Winston, Fortuna, Lucky Strike, Pall Mall, L&M, Burton, Chesterfield, Camel, Ducados Negro, Ducados Rubio, Nobel
2 28 0.051 0.242 0.212 0.5839 John Player Sp., Elixyr, Gold Coast, R 1, Karelia, Ducal, Bn, Bullbrand, Philip ‘Morris, Excite, Austin, Gauloises Rubio, News, Lambert & Butler, Vogue, Habanos, Popular, West, Silk Cut, Peter Stuyvesant, Winfield, Golden American, Coronas Negro, Benson & Hedges, Next, Superkings, Royals, Lark
3 12 0.077 0.094 0.818 0.7932 Royal Crown, Celtas, Rex, Mayfair, Dunhill, Rothmans, Gitanes, Condal, Davidoff Rubio, Regal, Kool, Fine 120
4 16 0.108 0.151 0.712 0.7619 Reales, Brooklyn, Bisonte, Sovereign, Sombra, Boncalo, Berkeley, More, Embassy, Craven A, Prince, Partagas, Romeo Y Julieta, Piper, Belga, Diana
5 4 0.239 0.252 0.948 0.8284 Kensitas Club, Gold Leaf, Salem, Viceroy
Divergent 2 Coronas Rubio, Bastos
a

p-value associated with the convergence test (H0: convergence of sales).

***

The convergence hypothesis is rejected at 99% confidence.

**

The convergence hypothesis is rejected at 95% confidence.

*

The convergence hypothesis is rejected at 90% confidence. If no asterisks are marked, the hypothesis of convergence in cigarette sales cannot be rejected.