Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Dec 4.
Published in final edited form as: Dig Dis Sci. 2018 Nov 14;64(5):1270–1280. doi: 10.1007/s10620-018-5372-1

Table 2.

Pharyngeal acidic reflux does not correlate with reflux symptom index (RSI) or reflux finding score (RFS) in patients with LPR (separate analysis in RSI- and RFS-positive patients)

Pharyngeal reflux RSI-positive patients (N = 20)
RFS-positive patients (N = 21)
Numbera and durationb of reflux episodes Correlation with RSI r#1 Numbera and durationb
of reflux episodes
Correlation with RFS r#2
pH < 4.0
 Number 0[0–1] − 0.19 0[0–1] − 0.28
 Duration 7 ± 4 s − 0.17 7 ± 4 s − 0.34
pH < 4.5
 Number 0.5[0–1] − 0.13 1[0–1] − 0.06
 Duration 18 ± 18 s − 0.23 19 ± 8 s − 0.26
pH < 5.0
 Number 1[0–2] +0.06 1[0–3] − 0.21
 Duration 36 ± 16 s − 0.33 38 ± 16 s − 0.20
pH < 5.5
 Number 3.5[1–6] +0.10 4[2–7] − 0.14
 Duration 75 ± 25 s − 0.35 68 ± 22 s − 0.27
pH < 6.0
 Number 13.5[8–23] +0.21 14[8–21] + 0.25
 Duration 305 ± 62 s − 0.26 314 ± 60 s − 0.03
Upright
pH < 6.0
 Number 13[7–21] +0.21 13[8–19] + 0.20
Impedance refluxc [7]
 Number 1[1–3] − 0.20 1[1–3] − 0.29
Impedance refluxd [25]
 Number 0[0–1] − 0.30 1[0–1] − 0.36
a

Number of reflux episodes per 24 h for indicated pH values expressed as median[IQR]

b

Duration of pharyngeal acid exposure per 24 h for indicated pH values expressed as mean ±SEM

c

LPR was defined according to Zerbib et al. [7]. No correlation was found even when upright and supine LPR was analyzed separately (not shown)

d

LPR was defined according to Kawamura et al. [23]. No correlation was found even when upright, and supine LPR was analyzed separately (not shown)

#1

Pearson correlation coefficient r > 0.37 is required for positive directional correlation in RSI-positive patients for significant correlation (P < 0.05)

#2

Pearson correlation coefficient r > 0.36 is required for positive directional correlation in RSF-positive patients for significant correlation (P < 0.05)