Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Dec 4.
Published in final edited form as: Dig Dis Sci. 2018 Nov 14;64(5):1270–1280. doi: 10.1007/s10620-018-5372-1

Table 3.

Pharyngeal acidic reflux does not correlate with reflux symptom index (RSI) or reflux finding score (RFS) in patients with LPR (all patients)

Pharyngeal reflux All patients (N = 27)
Numbera and
durationb of reflux episodes
Correlation with RSI r# Correlation with RFS r#
pH < 4.0
 Number 0[0–1] − 0.29 − 0.07
 Duration 6 ± 3 s − 0.08 − 0.15
pH < 4.5
 Number 1[0–1] − 0.27 + 0.15
 Duration 16 ± 6 s − 0.10 − 0.04
pH < 5.0
 Number 1[0–2] − 0.23 + 0.07
 Duration 32 ± 12 s − 0.15 + 0.00
pH < 5.5
 Number 4[1.5–6.5] − 0.04 − 0.03
 Duration 63 ± 18 s − 0.14 − 0.06
pH < 6.0
 Number 14[8–20.5] + 0.29 + 0.23
 Duration 279 ± 49 s + 0.04 + 0.11
Upright
pH < 6.0
 Number 13[7–18.5] + 0.29 + 0.22
Supine
pH < 6.0
 Number 3[1–4.5] − 0.03 + 0.00
Impedance refluxc [7]
 Number 1[0.5–3] − 0.29 − 0.07
Impedance refluxd [25]
 Number 0[0–1] − 0.29 − 0.16
a

Number of reflux episodes per 24 h for indicated pH values expressed as median[IQR]

b

Duration of pharyngeal acid exposure per 24 h for indicated pH values expressed as mean ± SEM

c

LPR was defined according to Zerbib et al. [7]. No correlation was found even when upright, and supine LPR was analyzed separately (not shown)

d

LPR was defined according to Kawamura et al. [23]. No correlation was found even when upright, and supine LPR was analyzed separately (not shown)

#

Pearson correlation coefficient r > 0.32 is required for significant positive directional correlation (P < 0.05)