Skip to main content
. 2023 Dec 4;14:153. doi: 10.1186/s40104-023-00949-7

Table 4.

Growth performance of Muscovy ducks fed BSF and YM live larvae provided at 5% of the expected ADFI

Item Age Dietary treatmenta SEM P-value
C BSF YM
LW, g 3 d 80.7 79.9 80.4 0.599 0.890
31 d 1,257 1,257 1,247 8.76 0.886
55 d 2,589 2,634 2,607 11.6 0.297
ADG, g/d 3–31 d 42.0 42.0 41.7 0.301 0.876
31–55 d 55.5 57.4 56.6 0.574 0.423
3–55 d 48.2 49.1 48.6 0.226 0.294
ADFI (g/d) + larvae 3–31 d 81.2 79.5 + 4.54 77.2 + 4.54 0.981 0.262
31–55 d 176 182 + 8.15 181 + 8.15 2.09 0.506
3–55 d 125 126 + 6.21 124 + 6.21 1.20 0.772
FCR (g/g, DM basis) + larvae 3–31 d 1.76 1.75 1.72 0.025 0.859
31–55 d 2.86 2.89 2.89 0.041 0.962
3–55 d 2.34 2.37 2.34 0.029 0.928

C Control, BSF Black soldier fly, YM Yellow mealworm, SEM Standard error of the mean, LW Live weight, ADG Average daily gain, ADFI Average daily feed intake (as fed), FCR Feed conversion ratio (on a dry matter basis, including the larvae intake), DM Dry matter

aThree dietary treatments: C: control, commercial feed; BSF: commercial feed + 5% live BSF larvae; YM: commercial feed + 5% live YM larvae