Table 4.
Hierarchical regression analyses of 16PF on dysfunctional attitudes and subtypes in the MDD group (n = 168)
| Standard coefficient | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DAS Total score | Vulnerability | Attraction and repulsion | Perfectionism | Compulsion | Seeking applause | Dependence | Self-determination attitude | Cognition philosophy | |
| A | -0.01 | -0.10 | — | — | — | — | — | 0.06 | — |
| B | — | — | -0.11 | — | -0.20 | — | — | — | — |
| C | -0.19 | -0.16 | -0.16 | -0.18 | — | -0.17 | -0.21 | -0.10 | 0.01 |
| E | — | — | — | -0.11 | — | — | — | — | — |
| F | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | -0.03 | — |
| G | -0.16 | -0.09 | -0.20 | -0.06 | — | -0.17 | — | — | -0.17 |
| H | -0.03 | — | — | — | -0.15 | — | -0.05 | -0.04 | -0.02 |
| L | 0.05 | 0.11 | — | — | — | 0.10 | 0.07 | — | — |
| M | — | — | — | -0.06 | — | — | — | -0.04 | — |
| O | 0.26 | 0.14 | 0.23 | 0.11 | 0.05 | 0.15 | 0.19 | 0.19 | 0.32 |
| Q2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | -0.16 | — | — |
| Q3 | — | — | -0.06 | — | -0.10 | 0.01 | — | — | — |
| Q4 | 0.05 | -0.07 | -0.01 | -0.02 | 0.13 | 0.08 | -0.02 | -0.03 | 0.10 |
| ΔR2 | 0.21 | 0.10 | 0.17 | 0.10 | 0.11 | 0.16 | 0.13 | 0.09 | 0.17 |
Bold values indicate statistical significance. ΔR2 indicates the changes R2 of the model from level 2 to level 3. The three hierarchies of the regression model were as follows: level 1: sex, age, education; level 2: duration of total episodes, duration of current episodes, episode counts, HAMA, HAMD24; level 3: 16PF factors that show a significant relationship with DAS total score and each subtype