Skip to main content
. 2023 Dec 4;23:901. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-05392-6

Table 5.

Hierarchical regression analyses of 16 PF on dysfunctional attitudes and subtypes in the healthy control group (n = 130)

Standard coefficient
DAS Total score Vulnerability Attraction and repulsion Perfectionism Compulsion Seeking applause Dependence Self-determination attitude Cognition philosophy
A -0.07
C 0.09 0.25 -0.06 -0.09 -0.05 -0.08 0.01
E -0.11 0.20
F 0.10 0.05 -0.09
G 0.05 -0.17
H 0.13 0.12 0.13 -0.06
L 0.19 0.19 0.21 0.17 0.13 0.19 0.02
N 0.26
O 0.18 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.11 -0.02 0.29
Q2 -0.25
Q3 -0.09 -0.15 -0.19 -0.09 -0.13 -0.01
Q4 0.44 0.44 0.41 0.29 0.26 0.17 0.39 0.23 -0.15
ΔR2 0.25 0.22 0.35 0.13 0.11 0.10 0.15 0.07 0.13

Bold values indicate statistical significance. ΔR2 indicates the changes R2 of the model from level 2 to level 3. The three hierarchies of the regression model were as follows: level 1: sex, age, education; level 2: HAMA, HAMD24; level 3: 16PF factors that show a significant relationship with DAS total score and each subtype