Table 4.
Comparison of magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging findings between patients with differentiated-type predominant mixed type and patients with undifferentiated-type predominant mixed type
| Eradicated group |
D-MIXa EGCsc n = 62 |
U-MIXb EGCs n = 8 |
p-value | |
| Differentiated-type findings | mesh pattern | 47 (76%) | 3 (38%) | 0.038 |
| loop pattern | 45 (73%) | 4 (50%) | 0.23 | |
| Undifferentiated-type findings | extended | 7 (11%) | 1 (13%) | > 0.99 |
| wavy | 26 (42%) | 6 (75%) | 0.13 | |
| cork | 11 (18%) | 6 (75%) | 0.0019 | |
| Non-eradicated group |
D-MIX n = 40 |
U-MIX n = 14 |
p-value | |
| Differentiated-type findings | mesh pattern | 34 (85%) | 4 (29%) | < 0.001 |
| loop pattern | 32 (80%) | 10 (71%) | 0.49 | |
| Undifferentiated-type findings | extended | 5 (13%) | 2 (14%) | > 0.99 |
| wavy | 13 (33%) | 7 (50%) | 0.34 | |
| cork | 6 (15%) | 7 (50%) | 0.025 |
adifferentiated-type predominant mixed type; bundifferentiated-type predominant mixed type; cearly gastric cancer