Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Dec 4.
Published in final edited form as: Contraception. 2022 Nov 1;118:109907. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2022.10.009

Table 2.

Interpersonal Quality of Family Planning score by treatment group and time among women participating in the CHARM2 intervention in rural India (n = 948) Maharashtra, India 2018–2020

Baseline
9-month follow-up
18-month follow-up
Overall Intervention Control p * Overall Intervention Control p * Overall Intervention Control p *

N 491 212 279 723 493 230 213 103 110
Average score [mean (SD)] 0.09 <0.001 <0.001
Score, range 1–5 2.62 (0.94) 2.54 (1.06) 2.68 (0.83) 2.92 (0.79) 3.22 (0.55) 2.30 (0.87) 3.01 (0.68) 3.19 (0.63) 2.84 (0.67)
Categorical average score [n (%)] <0.001 <0.001 0.02
Poor/fair 232 (47.3%) 116 (54.7%) 116 (41.6%) 0.004 165 (22.8%) 31 (6.3%) 134 (58.3%) <0.001 47 (22.1%) 15 (14.6%) 32 (29.1%) 0.01
Good 175 (35.6%) 54 (25.5%) 121 (43.4%) <0.001 410 (56.7%) 335 (67.9%) 75 (32.6%) <0.001 117 (54.9%) 59 (57.3%) 58 (52.7%) 0.50
Very good/excellent 84 (17.1%) 42 (19.8%) 42 (15.0%) 0.17 148 (20.5%) 127 (25.8%) 21 (9.1%) <0.001 49 (23.0%) 29 (28.2%) 20 (18.2%) 0.08
*

Intervention vs. control; t test for average score, Fisher exact test for overall categorical score, Wald test for specific categories of categorical score.