Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 16;105(23):1846–1856. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.22.01294

TABLE V.

Modeling of 2-Year MOXFQ Total Score Improvement*

Preoperative 2-Yr Improvement 2-Yr Model
No. Available Mean 95% CI P Value Mean 95% CI Effect Estimate P Value R2
Overall model R2 0.1368
Preoperative score 0.5437 <0.001 0.076
BMI NS
Male 299 72.30 70.62, 73.98 <0.0001 53.34 50.50, 56.17 NS
Female 202 79.29 77.43, 81.16 52.26 48.59, 55.94
Age ≥65 yr 324 73.70 72.05, 75.36 0.0029 54.81 52.11, 57.50 6.97 0.0029 0.0146
Age <65 yr 176 77.77 75.79, 79.74 49.29 45.31, 53.27
Patient-specific instrumentation§ 99 73.48 70.44, 76.52 0.2134 52.59 47.70, 57.48 NS
Standard instrumentation 402 75.52 74.11, 76.94 52.99 50.46, 55.52
Diagnosis: posttraumatic# 138 76.12 73.61, 78.64 0.2067 55.65 51.64, 59.66 8.06 0.0019 0.016
Diagnosis: inflammatory arthritis# 38 78.94 74.68, 83.20 0.2932 49.77 40.08, 59.46 NS
Diagnosis: degenerative 325 74.25 72.65, 75.85 52.10 49.29, 54.91
Previous smoker** 187 75.00 72.80, 77.19 0.3671 51.15 47.34, 54.97 −4.65 0.0368 0.0068
Current smoker** 31 81.33 76.62, 86.03 0.0028 48.93 36.43, 61.42 NS
Never smoker 283 74.52 72.85, 76.20 54.52 51.73, 57.30
Had previous surgery†† 131 77.63 75.02, 80.25 0.2218 47.43 42.59, 52.27 −9.96 0.0003 0.0234
No previous surgery 370 74.23 72.76, 75.70 54.77 52.27, 57.26
Varus deformity ≥15°‡‡ 58 72.91 68.41, 77.42 0.5013 54.60 47.40, 61.79 NS
Varus deformity <15° 443 75.41 74.08, 76.74 52.68 50.32, 55.04
Valgus deformity ≥15°§§ 28 73.31 68.18, 78.44 0.1971 54.66 46.47, 62.85 NS
Valgus deformity <15° 473 75.23 73.90, 76.56 52.81 50.48, 55.14
COFAS type 1 258 75.52 73.82, 77.22 51.78 48.57, 54.99
COFAS type 2## 123 73.12 70.44, 75.80 0.1339 54.78 50.55, 59.00 NS
COFAS type 3## 31 73.64 67.19, 80.09 0.4979 50.31 40.60, 60.02 NS
COFAS type 4## 89 77.24 74.08, 80.39 0.3396 54.61 49.14, 60.07 NS
*

NS = not significant in the final model. Baseline p values based on 1-way ANOVA; comparisons including the reference category. For factors with >2 categories, the p value is based on the least-squares mean difference between the category and the reference. For the modeling of the 2-year score improvement, a stepwise regression analysis was employed with all of the factors in the first column as predictors. For continuous variables (i.e., baseline score), the effect estimate describes the change in the improvement score if the predictor variable was increased by 1 point. For categorical variables, the effect estimate is the difference relative to the reference category.

Reference = female.

Reference = age of <65 years.

§

Reference = standard instrumentation.

#

Reference = degenerative disease.

**

Reference = never smoker.

††

Reference = no previous surgery.

‡‡

Reference = varus deformity of <15°.

§§

Reference = valgus deformity of <15°.

##

Reference = COFAS type 1.