Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Simul Nurs. 2023 Jul 6;81:101428. doi: 10.1016/j.ecns.2023.101428

Table 4.

Evaluations of Nursing Faculty (n = 10)

Variable Strongly Disagree Disagree Neither Agree Strongly Agree
n (%)
Overall Impressions
Positive first reaction --- --- --- 6 (60) 4 (40)
Innovative --- --- --- 1 (10) 9 (90)
Captures interest --- --- --- 2 (20) 8 (80)
Look/appearance 2 (20) 7 (70) 1 (10)
Realism
Realistic --- 1 (10) 2 (20) 6 (60) 1 (10)
Accurate --- 2 (20) 3 (30) 4 (40) 1 (10)
Effective --- 2 (20) 2 (20) 5 (50) 1 (10)
User-Friendliness
Easy to use --- --- 1 (10) 3 (30) 6 (60)
Engagement
Engaging --- --- --- 5 (50) 5 (50)
Something new --- --- --- 3 (30) 7 (70)
Usefulness
Enhances teaching --- --- --- 5 (50) 5 (50)
Meets teaching need --- --- --- 4 (40) 6 (60)
Utilize within classroom --- --- 3 (30) 2 (20) 5 (50)
Recommend to faculty --- --- --- 6 (60) 4 (40)
Useful to education --- --- --- 5 (50) 5 (50)
Effectiveness
Improves student knowledge --- --- 2 (20) 6 (60) 2 (20)
Improves student understanding --- 1 (10) 2 (20) 4 (40) 3 (30)
Improves student clinical skills --- --- 1 (10) 5 (50) 4 (40)
Improves student clinical decision-making --- --- 2 (20) 5 (50) 3 (30)
Improves student confidence --- --- 1 (10) 4 (40) 5 (50)
Privacy and Comfort Issues
Promotes student privacy --- --- 1 (10) 4 (40) 5 (50)
Reduces student embarrassment --- --- --- 7 (70) 3 (30)
Does not cause student discomfort --- --- 3 (30) 5 (50) 2 (20)

Very Dissatisfied Dissatisfied Neutral Neutral Satisfied Very Satisfied

Satisfaction with Features n (%)
Realism --- --- 2 (20) 7 (70) 1 (10)
User-friendliness --- --- 2 (20) 4 (40) 4 (40)
Engagement --- --- --- 5 (50) 5 (50)
Usefulness --- --- 1 (10) 5 (50) 4 (40)
Effectiveness --- --- 4 (40) 4 (40) 2 (20)
Innovation --- --- --- 4 (40) 6 (60)
Look/appearance --- --- 3 (30) 5 (50) 2 (20)
Quality --- --- 1 (10) 6 (60) 3 (30)
Promotes privacy / minimizes discomfort --- --- 1 (10) 3 (30) 6 (60)