Table 2.
Characteristics of the included studies.
| Author/yr of publication | Study design | No. patients/sockets | Male/female | Age (yr) | Grafted sites (number) | Grafted materials | No. implants | Reentry (mo) | Follow-up (mo) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group I: APD versus BCH | |||||||||
| del Canto-Díaz et al 2019 | Split-mouth RCT | 6/12 | 3/3 | 47.6 ± 9.04 | NR | APD: Filled with 300–1200 µm mineralized APD, covering 15*20 mm collagen membrane | 2, 4 | ||
| BCH: Covered 15*20 mm collagen membrane | |||||||||
| Isola et al 2022 | Split-mouth RCT | 14/28 | 6/8 | 48.2 (37–62) | Maxillary anterior region | APD: Filled with mineralized APD, covering free gingival graft | APD: 14 | 4 | 19 |
| BCH: Covered free gingival graft | BCH: 14 | ||||||||
| Joshi et al 2016 | Split-mouth RCT | 15/45 | 9/6 | 35.6 ± 5.7 (28–45) | APD: Upper (10), lower (5) | APD: Filled with 300–500 µm partially demineralized APD, covering chorion membrane (Tissue Bank, India) | 4 | ||
| OGM: Upper (8), lower (7) | OGM: Filled with β-TCP alloplast (SyboGraf-T Plug, India), covering chorion membrane (Tissue Bank, India) | ||||||||
| BCH: Upper (8), lower (7) | BCH: Covered chorion membrane (Tissue Bank, India) | ||||||||
| Kuperschlag et al 2020 | Split-mouth RCT | 13/24 (APD: 13 sites; BCH: 11 sites) | 3/10 | 22.61 (18–27) | Third molar | APD: Filled with demineralized APD, absorbable hemostatic gelatin sponge | 3, 12 | ||
| BCH: Absorbable hemostatic gelatin sponge | |||||||||
| Mazzucchi et al 2022 | Split-mouth RCT | 10/20 | 4/6 | 32.7 ± 9.8 | Third molar | APD: Filled with 300–1200 µm demineralized APD | 3, 6 | ||
| BCH: No graft | |||||||||
| Sánchez-Labrador et al 2020 | Split-mouth RCT | 15/30 | 4/11 | 21.86 | Third molar | APD: Filled with 300–1200 µm demineralized APD, fibrin sponge (Gelatamp, Germany) | m | 3, 6 | |
| BCH: No graft | |||||||||
| Yüceer-Cetiner et al 2021 | RCT | APD: 3/20 | 4/5 | 31–62 | NR | APD: Filled with 300–1200 µm demineralized APD, covering resorbable membrane (Bio-Gide, Geistlich, Switzerland) | NR | 3 | |
| BCH: 3/16 | BCH: No graft | ||||||||
| Group II: APD versus OGM | |||||||||
| Jung et al 2018 | RCT | APD: 8/8 | APD: 4/4 | APD: 46.63 ± 18.12 | APD: Molar (7) | APD: Filled with demineralized APD, covering absorbable atelocollagen plug (Rapiplug, Korea) | NR | 4 | |
| OGM: 8/8 | OGM: 5/3 | OGM: 49.75 ± 17.21 | OGM: Premolar (3), molar (5) | OGM: Filled with Bio-Oss Collagen, covering absorbable atelocollagen plug (Rapiplug, Korea) | |||||
| Pang et al 2017 | RCT | APD: 15/21 | APD: 8/7 | APD: 58.53 ± 7.66 | APD: Maxilla (14), mandible (7) | APD: Filled with 300–800 µm demineralized APD | APD: 15 | 6 | |
| OGM: 9/12 | OGM: 3/6 | OGM: 60.56 ± 10.49 | OGM: Maxilla (7), mandible (5) | OGM: Filled with Bio-Oss (Geistlich, Switzerland) | OGM: 9 | ||||
| Santos et al 2021 | RCT | APD: 26/34 | APD: 15/11 | APD: 56.8 ± 12.3 | APD: Anterior (12), posterior (22) | APD: Filled with 250–1200 µm mineralized APD, covering resorbable barrier membrane (Bio-Gide, Geistlich, Switzerland) and free gingival graft | APD: 34 | 6 | 12, 18 |
| OGM: 26/32 | OGM: 16/10 | OGM: 61.5 ± 13.1 | OGM: Anterior (19), posterior (13) | OGM: Filled with Bio-Oss, covering resorbable barrier membrane (Bio-Gide, Geistlich, Switzerland) and free gingival graft | OGM: 32 | ||||
| Author/yr of publication | Primary outcomes | Secondary outcomes | |||||||
| Change in horizontal ridge width (mm) | Change in labial bone height (mm) | Histomorphometry (%) | Primary implant stability | Postoperative complications | |||||
| Group I: APD versus BCH | |||||||||
| del Canto-Díaz et al 2019 | APD: 2 mo: −0.17 ± 0.55; 4 mo: −0.46 ± 0.56 | APD: 2 mo: −0.14 ± 0.75; 4 mo: −0.16 ± 0.78 | NR | ||||||
| BCH: 2 mo: −1.11 ± 0.98; 4 mo: −1.91 ± 1.43 | BCH: 2 mo: −0.29 ± 2.24; 4 mo: −2.22 ± 2.07 | ||||||||
| Isola et al 2022 | APD: Vital bone: 34.23 ± 13.56; residual grafts: 30.22 ± 14.48; connective tissue: 27.36 ± 9.65 | NR | 0 | ||||||
| BCH: Vital bone: 30.22 ± 14.48; connective tissue: 29.23 ± 10.16 | |||||||||
| Joshi et al 2016 | APD: −0.15 ± 0.08 | APD: −0.28 ± 0.13 | 0 | ||||||
| OGM: −1.45 ± 0.40 | OGM: −1.72 ± 0.56 | ||||||||
| BCH: −2.29 ± 0.40 | BCH: −2.60 ± 0.88 | ||||||||
| Kuperschlag et al 2020 | 0 | ||||||||
| Mazzucchi et al 2022 | 0 | ||||||||
| Sánchez-Labrador et al 2020 | APD: 2 (1 abscess, 1 wound dehiscence) | ||||||||
| 3 (1 abscess, 1 wound dehiscence, 1 hematoma) | |||||||||
| Yüceer-Cetiner et al 2021 | APD: Vital bone: 19.32 ± 1.91; vessel: 14.76 ± 0.94; connective tissue: 41.57 ± 3.63 | 0 | |||||||
| BCH: Vital bone: 18.68 ± 1.18; vessel: 16.92 ± 0.66; connective tissue: 27.34 ± 2.06 | |||||||||
| Group II: APD versus OGM | |||||||||
| Jung et al 2018 | APD: −0.78 ± 0.41 | APD: Vital bone: 32.88 ± 14.48; residual grafts: 10.72 ± 9.83; connective tissue:56.40 ± 8.58 | APD: 2 (pain) | ||||||
| OGM: −1.68 ± 1.11 | OGM: Vital bone: 22.00 ± 11.01; residual grafts: 13.20 ± 9.79; connective tissue:64.80 ± 10.11 | OGM: 1 (swelling and pain) | |||||||
| Pang et al 2017 | APD: Vital bone: 31.24 ± 13.87; residual grafts: 8.95 ± 6.15; connective tissue:59.81 ± 15.50 | APD: 72.80 ± 10.81 | 0 | ||||||
| OGM: Vital bone: 35.00 ± 19.33; residual grafts: 17.08 ± 16.57; connective tissue:47.93 ± 24.46 | OGM: 70.0 ± 12.86 | ||||||||
| Santos et al 2021 | APD: Vital bone: 47.3 ± 14.8; residual grafts: 12.2 ± 7.7; connective tissue:40.5 ± 17.6 | APD: 77.1 ± 6.9 | 0 | ||||||
| OGM: Vital bone: 34.9 ± 13.2; residual grafts: 22.1 ± 10.9; connective tissue:42.9 ± 9.6 | OGM: 77.0 ± 5.9 | ||||||||
β-TCP = beta-tricalcium phosphate, APD = autogenous particulated dentin group, BCH = blood clot healing group, NR = not report, OGM = other grafted materials group, RCT = randomized controlled trial.