Skip to main content
. 2005 Apr;79(8):4774–4781. doi: 10.1128/JVI.79.8.4774-4781.2005

TABLE 1.

Sensitivities of WT and mutant pseudoviruses against a panel of inhibitors

Pseudovirus Sensitivitya to:
N44*
Five-helix inhibitor
C34
T20
sCD4
GM (nM) Ratio (P) GM (nM) Ratio (P) GM (nM) Ratio (P) GM (nM) Ratio (P) GM (nM) Ratio (P)
JR-CSF
    WT 696 1.00 131 1.00 198 1.00 969 1.00 23.33 1.00
    NC 1,430 2.05 (<0.001) 696 5.31 (<0.001) 324 1.63 (0.009) 1,895 1.96 (0.003) 7.12 0.31 (<0.001)
    N 897 1.29 (0.06) 276 2.11 (<0.001) 382 1.93 (<0.001) 1,047 1.08 (0.9) 8.34 0.36 (<0.001)
    C 1,184 1.7 (<0.001) 275 2.10 (<0.001) 311 1.57 (0.02) 1,440 1.49 (0.087) 30.69 1.32 (0.3)
HXB2
    WT 421 1.00 NDb 8.95 1.00 ND 0.062 1.00
    NC 924 2.19 (<0.001) ND 25.12 2.81 (<0.001) ND 0.104 1.68 (0.006)
    N 577 1.37 (0.01) ND 15.71 1.76 (0.02) ND 0.101 1.63 (0.009)
    C 668 1.58 (<0.001) ND 14.46 1.62 (0.047) ND 0.058 0.93 (0.9)
a

The GM of the 50% inhibitor concentration was calculated for each inhibitor and pseudovirus. The ratio is fold change of the mutant value compared to the WT value, calculated by dividing the GM for each mutant by the GM for the WT. Values shown represent averages from at least five independent experiments. The N44*, C34, and T20 peptides are shown in Figure 1. The five-helix inhibitor is described in Results. Statistically significant changes are in boldface.

b

ND, not done.