Skip to main content
. 2023 Nov 24;47(6):818–825. doi: 10.4093/dmj.2023.0171

Table 2.

Primary endpoint: change ratea of LDL-C from baseline

Statistic Rosuvastatin Rosuvastatin/Ezetimibe LS mean difference (SE) 95% CI P value
PPS
Number 45 41
Mean±SD –51.35±17.24 –60.71±19.62
P value <0.0001b <0.0001b
LS mean (SE)c –55.44 (6.85) –63.90 (6.89) –8.47 (4.01) –16.44 to 0.49 0.0378
FAS
Number 51 48
Mean±SD –50.90±20.42 –57.08±22.35
P value <0.0001b <0.0001b
LS mean (SE)c –45.58 (5.53) –50.11 (5.93) –4.52 (4.22) –12.91 to 3.86 0.2868

LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LS, least square; SE, standard error; CI, confidence interval; PPS, per-protocol set; SD, standard deviation; FAS, full analysis set.

a

Change rate (%)=[(LDL-C at 24 weeks)–(baseline LDL-C)]/(baseline LDL-C)×100,

b

Difference between baseline and post-baseline in each group: Wilcoxon signed rank test,

c

Difference between control and treatment group (analysis of covariance [ANCOVA] using baseline value and glycosylated hemoglobin level [<9%, ≥9%] as covariate).