Table 4.
Subgroup analysis of incidence rates and hazard ratios of shoulder adhesive capsulitis by age and sex according to presence of T2DM
Groups | Total no. | No. of AC | Duration, yra | IRb | HR (95% CI) | P valuec | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Age, yr | ||||||||
20–29 | T2DM (–) | 495,995 | 3,757 | 4,106,251.64 | 0.9149 | 1 (ref) | <0.0001 | |
T2DM (+) | 4,346 | 72 | 35,890.55 | 2.0061 | 2.509 (2.005–3.139) | |||
30–39 | T2DM (–) | 741,853 | 19,411 | 6,096,050.13 | 3.1842 | 1 (ref) | ||
T2DM (+) | 20,350 | 1,121 | 164,403.3 | 6.8186 | 2.401 (2.266–2.545) | |||
40–49 | T2DM (–) | 919,266 | 82,549 | 7,329,519.4 | 11.2625 | 1 (ref) | ||
T2DM (+) | 54,586 | 8,003 | 417,646.15 | 19.1622 | 1.806 (1.765–1.849) | |||
50–59 | T2DM (–) | 606,814 | 80,487 | 4,698,566.11 | 17.1301 | 1 (ref) | ||
T2DM (+) | 69,628 | 12,033 | 516,335.96 | 23.3046 | 1.430 (1.402–1.458) | |||
60–69 | T2DM (–) | 318,179 | 50,980 | 2,381,312.83 | 21.4084 | 1 (ref) | ||
T2DM (+) | 57,145 | 10,107 | 411,001.56 | 24.5911 | 1.169 (1.144–1.194) | |||
70–79 | T2DM (–) | 131,128 | 18,840 | 926,577.41 | 20.3329 | 1 (ref) | ||
T2DM (+) | 27,462 | 3,870 | 184,419.25 | 20.9848 | 1.033 (0.997–1.069) | |||
≥80 | T2DM (–) | 20,869 | 1,625 | 123,042.34 | 13.2068 | 1 (ref) | ||
T2DM (+) | 4,124 | 333 | 22,620.67 | 14.721 | 1.114 (0.990–1.254) | |||
Sex | <0.0001 | |||||||
Male | T2DM (–) | 1,830,913 | 111,135 | 14,632,233.01 | 7.5952 | 1 (ref) | ||
T2DM (+) | 160,555 | 20,405 | 1,191,260.95 | 17.1289 | 1.511 (1.488–1.534) | |||
Female | T2DM (–) | 1,403,191 | 146,514 | 11,029,086.85 | 13.2843 | 1 (ref) | ||
T2DM (+) | 77,086 | 15,134 | 561,056.49 | 26.9741 | 1.234 (1.213–1.255) |
HR was adjusted for age, sex, smoking status, alcohol consumption, regular exercise, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and body mass index.
T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus; AC, shoulder adhesive capsulitis; IR, incidence rate; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval.
Duration, total follow-up period of all subjects
Per 1,000 person-years,
P value for trend, according to Cox proportional hazard regression analyses.