Table 3.
Adjusted ORs (95% CIs) for withdrawal from HTTx by residential area and degree of housing damage
| Inland area | Coastal area | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No damage (n = 1924) | Partially destroyeda (n = 3378) | More than half destroyeda (n = 558) | No damagea (n = 707) | Partially destroyeda (n = 1394) | More than half destroyeda (n = 1257) | |
| No. of participants under HTTx | 1862 | 3261 | 543 | 671 | 1326 | 1215 |
| No. of participants who withdrew from HTTx | 62 | 117 | 15 | 36 | 68 | 42 |
| Percentage of participants who withdrew from HTTx | 3.2 | 3.5 | 2.7 | 5.1 | 4.9 | 3.3 |
| Model 1: Crude OR (95% CI) | 1.00 (Ref.) | 1.08 (0.79–1.48) | 0.83 (0.45–1.43) | 1.61 (1.05–2.44) | 1.54 (1.08–2.19) | 1.04 (0.69–1.54) |
| p value | 0.640 | 0.522 | 0.026 | 0.016 | 0.854 | |
| Model 2: Adjusted OR (95% CI) | 1.00 (Ref.) | 1.06 (0.77–1.46) | 0.77 (0.42–1.33) | 1.64 (1.06–2.51) | 1.64 (1.14–2.36) | 1.09 (0.71–1.65) |
| p value | 0.732 | 0.375 | 0.025 | 0.008 | 0.688 | |
| Model 3: Adjusted OR (95% CI) | 1.00 (Ref.) | 1.06 (0.78–1.46) | 0.74 (0.40–1.29) | 1.62 (1.04–2.50) | 1.69 (1.17–2.45) | 1.08 (0.71–1.65) |
| p value | 0.719 | 0.312 | 0.03 | 0.005 | 0.708 | |
Model 1: unadjusted; Model 2: adjusted for age, sex, and fiscal year of survey participation; Model 3: adjusted for age, sex, fiscal year of survey participation, smoking status, drinking status, having psychological distress, social network status, educational background, having a spouse, having children, living with family, ever been diagnosed with diabetes, ever been diagnosed with dyslipidemia, employment status, and estimated daily salt intake
CI confidence interval, OR odds ratio, HTTx treatment for hypertension
aOdds ratios, 95% confidence intervals, and p values for inland areas (partially destroyed), inland areas (more than half destroyed), coastal areas (no damage), coastal areas (partially destroyed), and coastal areas (more than half destroyed) compared to those of inland areas (no damage) are shown