Table 1.
Summary of the analyses for the dependent variable Communication (PREM), multilevel linear regression
| Potential case-mix variable | Fixed effect significant (y/n) | Slope effect GP level important* (y/n) |
Slope effect Country level important (y/n) |
Case-mix adjustment (y/n) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-reported general health |
Yes Worse self-reported health → experienced communication worse |
No | No | Yes |
| Longstanding disease |
Yes Longstanding disease → experienced communication worse |
No | No | Yes |
| Patient’s age | Yes, Older patients → experienced communication worse | No | No | Yes |
| Patient’s sex | No | No | No | No |
| Education |
Yes Higher education → experienced communication better |
Yes | No |
No Importantly more variation at GP level with lower educated |
| Income |
Yes Higher household income → experienced communication better |
No | No | Yes |
| Migrant status |
Yes 1st generation migrant → experienced communication worse |
Yes | No |
No Importantly more variation at GP level with 1st generation migrants |
| Place of living | No | Yes | No |
No No significant fixed effect, but importantly more variation in small towns compared to suburbs and rural areas |
*Important means that the difference in variance between categories is more that 0.25*variance in the model with fixed effect and random intercept