Table 3.
Summary of the analyses for the dependent variable Continuity of care (PREM), multilevel linear regression
| Potential case-mix variable | Fixed effect significant (y/n) | Slope effect GP level important* (y/n) |
Slope effect country level important (y/n) |
Case-mix control (y/n) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-reported general health |
Yes Worse self-reported health → better experience continuity |
No | Yes |
No Importantly more variation at country level for people with very good self-reported health |
| Longstanding disease |
Yes Longstanding disease → better experienced continuity |
No | No | Yes |
| Patient’s age |
Yes Older than 40 → better experienced comtimuity |
No | No | Yes |
| Patient’s sex |
Yes Women → better experienced continuity |
No | No | Yes |
| Education |
Yes Higher education → worse experienced continuity |
No | No | Yes |
| Income | No | No | No | No |
| Migrant status |
Yes Migrant status → worse experienced continuity |
No | No | Yes |
| Place of living |
Yes Outside big cities and suburbs → better experienced continuity |
No | No | Yes |
*Important means that the difference in variance between categories is more that 0.25*variance in the model with fixed effect and random intercept