Skip to main content
. 2023 Dec 5;13:21414. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-48505-7

Table 2.

Results from the F-test assessing model fit comparison for N2 and P3 Component.

Model Marginal R2 (%) △Marginal R2 (%) F (DF) p-value
N2 amplitude
 Baseline 5.34
   + CTT 6.73 1.39 2.90 (4, 258) 0.023
   + TrOnset 9.88 3.15 1.88 (6, 268) 0.084
   + PTSD 10.76 0.89 0.84 (12, 279) 0.609
N2 latency
 Baseline 7.93
   + CTT 10.22 2.28 4.10 (4, 258) 0.003
   + TrOnset 10.80 0.59 1.02 (6, 268) 0.410
   + PTSD 11.46 0.65 0.68 (12, 279) 0.768
P3 amplitude
 Baseline 3.94
   + CTT 6.05 2.11 4.88 (4, 292) 0.001
   + TrOnset 8.22 2.18 2.64 (6, 304) 0.016
   + PTSD 8.54 0.31 0.50 (12, 316) 0.916
P3 latency
 Baseline 4.14
   + CTT 5.16 1.01 3.39 (4, 291) 0.010
   + TrOnset 6.38 1.22 2.37 (6, 303) 0.030
   + PTSD 7.85 1.47 0.65 (12, 313) 0.802

Baseline model: ERP ~ mTBI + Age + Sex + Combat Exposure + Site + Deployment + (1/StudyID/Site), CTT = Cumulative Interpersonal and non-interpersonal Trauma Type (as 2 separate summed variables), TrOnset = Trauma Onset (4gp: Trauma < 10, Trauma 10–17, Trauma 18 + , No Trauma), Post-deployment PTSD = PCL Score (2gp: PCL < 30 Low; PCL >  = 30 High), F (DF) = F value (Num DF, Den DF).