Skip to main content
. 2023 Nov 11;29(4):348–358. doi: 10.25259/IJPC_306_2022

Table 2:

CASP evaluation of the various qualitative and quantitative studies included in SLR.

Critical appraisal questions Olsson Möller et al. Saraswathi et al. Panchik et al. Campbell et al. Samami et al. Wei
et al.
Galliford et al. Baydoun et al. Komatsu et al. Blank
et al.
Rao
et al.
Wang et al. Yi
et al.
O’Neill et al. El-Hashimi and Gorey Hsueh et al.
Did the review address a clearly focused question? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Did the authors look for the right type of papers? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Do you think all the important, relevant studies were included? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Did the review’s authors do enough to assess the quality of the included studies? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
If the results of the review have been combined, was it reasonable to do so? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
What are the overall results of the review? Yoga-based interventions help in alleviating the mood and reduce the anxiety as seen in many of the studies
How precise are the results? Highly precise Highly precise Highly precise Highly precise Highly precise Highly precise Highly precise Highly precise Highly precise Highly precise Highly precise Highly precise Highly precise Highly precise Highly precise
Can the results be applied to the local population? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Were all important outcomes considered? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Are the benefits worth the harms and costs? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

CASP: Critical appraisal skills programme, SLR: Systematic literature review