Skip to main content
. 2023 Dec 5;9:142. doi: 10.1186/s40795-023-00802-0

Table 5.

Nutrient adequacy from food alone by cognitive function status among males 60 + years of age

Total CFT Composite Z-Score
Z-score Q1 Z-score Q2 Z-score Q3 Z-score Q4
n = 395 n = 301 n = 231 n = 198
% < EAR
Nutrient EAR % ± SE % ± SE % ± SE % ± SE
 Vitamin A, RAE (μg) 625 54 ± 4.3 * 45 ± 5.4 * 30 ± 7.2 29 ± 3.9
 Vitamin E as alpha-tocopherol (mg) 12 89 ± 2.2 * 83 ± 3.7 * 70 ± 3.7 60 ± 5.6
 Vitamin D (D2 + D3) (μg) 10 94 ± 1.7 93 ± 2.4 92 ± 2.9 91 ± 2.5
 Vitamin C (mg) 75 54 ± 3.9 52 ± 5.3 54 ± 5.0 42 ± 5.3
 Thiamin (Vitamin B1) (mg) 1 11 ± 3.2 * 4 ± 1.4  < 3  < 3
 Riboflavin (Vitamin B2) (mg) 1.1 6 ± 1.7 *  < 3 *  < 3  < 3
 Niacin (mg) 12  < 3  < 3  < 3  < 3
 Vitamin B6 (mg) 1.4 18 ± 4.0 * 8 ± 2.4 5 ± 2.0  < 3
 Folate, DFE (μg) 320 17 ± 4.1 * 8 ± 2.2 4 ± 1.2  < 3
 Vitamin B12 (μg) 2 6 ± 2.1 *  < 3  < 3  < 3
 Calcium (mg) 800a 46 ± 2.9 * 39 ± 5.2 28 ± 2.5 24 ± 4.7
 Iron (mg) 6  < 3  < 3  < 3  < 3
 Magnesium (mg) 350 77 ± 2.6 * 68 ± 3.6 * 56 ± 4.7 46 ± 5.5
 Phosphorus (mg) 580  < 3  < 3  < 3  < 3
 Zinc (mg) 9.4 38 ± 4.6 * 24 ± 5.6 14 ± 3.8 13 ± 4.2
 Copper (mg) 0.7 4 ± 1.9  < 3  < 3  < 3
 Selenium (μg) 45  < 3  < 3  < 3  < 3
AI % > AI
 Vitamin K (μg) 120 27 ± 3.3 35 ± 3.8 * 42 ± 5.8 60 ± 9.5
 Total choline (mg) 550  < 3  < 3 7 ± 3.1 7 ± 2.2
 Potassium (mg) 3400 18 ± 2.6 27 ± 4.4 * 38 ± 6.7 46 ± 4.8
 Dietary fiber (g) 30 5 ± 1.5 6 ± 2.1 * 9 ± 2.7 16 ± 3.5

Model 2: covariates for day of the week (weekday/weekend), sequence of the dietary recall (day 1 or 2), whether the participant reported use of any dietary supplement in the past 30 days, and age (60–69 y, 70–79 y, 80 + y), education, race/ethnicity, marital status, PIR, comorbidities (CHD, stroke, hypertension, diabetes, cancer), kidney function (GFR and albuminuria), BMI, smoking status, physical activity, and alcohol intake

Estimated values of % < EAR or % > AI less than 3% or greater than 97% are expressed “ < 3” and “ > 97”, respectively, and the SE’s are not displayed, in accordance with the USDA’s practice in reporting nutrient adequacy. Statistical comparisons were conducted using the estimated values < 3% or > 97%

*Statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) compared to Q4

aEAR for males 51—70 y is 800 mg and the EAR for males 71 + y is 1000 mg. An EAR of 800 mg was selected to conservatively estimate the percent below the EAR