Skip to main content
. 2023 Dec 5;21:280. doi: 10.1186/s12915-023-01778-w

Table 1.

Effect of BBR on FtfLs from different strains. The inhibition of BBR on FtfLs from S. faecalis, L. reuteri, L. acidophilus, and L. fermentum is not determined due to non-detectable enzymatic activity; “ns” means no significance, representing that FtfL from this strain is not inhibited by BBR

Strain ftfl Gene ID Inhibited by BBR (IC50)
CRC pathogens
Peptostreptococcus anaerobius 79,842,341 62.3 ± 10 μM
Fusobacterium nucleatum 45,633,862 106.2 ± 27.0 μM
Clostridium symbiosum 57,969,199 128.9 ± 17.1 μM
Lactococcus lactis 69,713,002 118.1 ± 18.5 μM
Streptococcus faecalis 60,894,021 /
Colitis pathogens
Bacteroides fragilis 66,328,797 105.1 ± 69.8 μM
Clostridioides difficile 66,353,223 158.0 ± 68.7 μM
Vibrio cholerae 69,721,326 129.6 ± 12.3 μM
Clostridium perfringens 69,450,453 104.9 ± 3.15 μM
Nonpathogenic bacteria
Clostridium ljungdahlii 45,181,033 83.8 ± 10 μM
Clostridium sporogenes 69,424,169 ns
Parabacteroides distasonis 57,237,971  > 200.0 μM
Ruminococcus obeum 15,206,023 100.1 ± 3.26 μM
Probiotics
Lactobacillus plantarum 57,025,392  > 200.0 μM
Lactobacillus reuteri 69,707,752 /
Lactobacillus acidophilus 56,943,130 /
Lactobacillus fermentum 12,456,081 /