Skip to main content
. 2023 Dec 4;23:836. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-06136-w

Table 4.

Modified Poisson regression analysis for some important adverse outcomes in hemi-uterus pregnancy compared to the normal uterus

Study group (n = 112) Control group (n = 224) P value Unadjusted RR (95%CI) Adjusted RR (95%CI) P value
PTB (%/n)

18.8

(21)

2.8

(7)

0.000 7.0(2.9–16.9) 6.8a (2.7–16.7) 0.000
PPROM (%/n)

11.6

(13)

0.9 (2) 0.001 13.0(3.0-56.6) 14.1b (3.2–62.5) 0.001
Malpresentation (%/n)

45.5

(51)

3.1 (7) 0.000 14.6(6.8–31.1) 13.2c (6.3–27.7) 0.000
CD (%/n)

90.2

(101)

21.0(47) 0.000 4.3(3.3–5.6) 4.4d (3.3–5.7) 0.000
CDe (%/n) 87.9 (80/91e) 17.0 (38/182e) 0.000 4.2 (3.1–5.6) 4.3d (3.2–5.9) 0.000

Data are presented as percent (numbers) or mean ± SD

RR, risk ratio; CI, confidence interval; PTB, preterm birth, PPROM, preterm premature rupture of membranes; CS, cesarean section

a Adjusted for age, BMI, level of education; ART, PROM, hypertensive disorders, gestational diabetes; placenta previa; placenta abruption;

b Adjusted for age, BMI, level of education, hypertensive disorders, gestational diabetes;

c Adjusted for ages, BMI, parity, birthweight, placenta previa;

d Adjusted for age, ART, BMI, level of education, hypertensive disorders, gestational diabetes; ICP, placenta previa; placenta abrupt

e Represent the number limited to nulliparous women