Skip to main content
. 2023 Dec 5;22:216. doi: 10.1186/s12944-023-01982-1

Table 2.

Logistic analysis of the relationship between different levels of dietary UFA/TF and insulin resistance status

UFA/TF ratio Q1 UFA/TF ratio Q2 UFA/TF ratio Q3
Crude OR (95%CI), Pvalue Ref 1.059 (0.895 ~ 1.253), 0.507 0.838 (0.709 ~ 0.991), 0.038
M1 OR (95%CI), Pvalue Ref 0.970 (0.797 ~ 1.180), 0.758 0.785 (0.645 ~ 0.956), 0.016
M2 OR (95%CI), Pvalue Ref 0.977 (0.794 ~ 1.203), 0.828 0.805 (0.648 ~ 1), 0.049

Note: The crude analysis did not include the effects of covariable. M1 (Model 1) represents the analysis after adjusting for the influence of the following covariables: age, gender, and BMI. M2 (Model 2) represents the analysis adjusted for the effects of the following covariates: age, gender, BMI, race, total energy intake, total protein, total carbohydrate, total sugars, total dietary fiber, total fat, alcohol consumption, diabetes, and hypercholesterolemia