Table A1.
Comparison of results from negative binomial and (nonspatial) OLS regression models, Ellis Act petitions, 2011–15.
| Negative binomial (outcome: count of petitions) |
OLS (outcome: logged petition rate) |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coeff. | Sig. | SE | Coeff. | Sig. | SE | |
|
| ||||||
| Household income in $1,000 | − 0.0052 | 0.0077 | − 0.0001 | 0.0035 | ||
| % Vacant | 0.0315 | 0.0200 | 0.0144 | 0.0088 | ||
| Median gross rent in $100 | 0.0295 | 0.0306 | − 0.0098 | 0.0148 | ||
| Median home value in $1,000 | 0.0013 | *** | 0.0005 | 0.0006 | *** | 0.0002 |
| % Renter occupied units | − 0.0350 | *** | 0.0053 | − 0.0090 | *** | 0.0026 |
| % Households with children | − 0.0043 | 0.0090 | − 0.0056 | 0.0042 | ||
| % Black | 0.0499 | *** | 0.0078 | 0.0186 | *** | 0.0034 |
| % Hispanic | 0.0290 | *** | 0.0087 | 0.0151 | *** | 0.0038 |
| % Asian | 0.0207 | *** | 0.0074 | 0.0084 | ** | 0.0034 |
| % with college degree or more | 0.0591 | *** | 0.0113 | 0.0274 | *** | 0.0051 |
| Poverty rate | 0.0114 | 0.0099 | 0.0056 | 0.0047 | ||
| Unemployment rate | 0.0325 | 0.0357 | − 0.0045 | 0.0163 | ||
| % without a high school diploma | 0.0837 | *** | 0.0196 | 0.0271 | *** | 0.0084 |
| LIHTC units | 0.0010 | 0.0007 | − 0.0001 | 0.0004 | ||
| Public housing units | − 0.0026 | 0.0016 | − 0.0005 | 0.0005 | ||
| Housing Choice Vouchers | − 0.0035 | ** | 0.0017 | 0.0000 | 0.0007 | |
| Newly constructed units | 0.0096 | * | 0.0053 | 0.0041 | 0.0026 | |
| Constant | − 4.2437 | *** | 0.9902 | − 1.8947 | *** | 0.4240 |
| No. observations | 806 | 806 | ||||
Note. OLS = ordinary least squares; LIHTC = Low-Income Housing Tax Credit; SE = standard error.
p < .1
p < .05
p < .01.