Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Dec 5.
Published in final edited form as: Dig Dis Sci. 2021 Aug 21;67(8):4215–4222. doi: 10.1007/s10620-021-07228-3

Table 3.

The association of controlled attenuation parameter with depression and general health

NHANES item Definition of outcome Univariate analysis p-value Multivariate analysis1 p-value
Depression questionnaire (PHQ-9)2 Binary variable (0/1) produced by scoring > 10 points out of a total of 27 points from 9 items of questionnaire S1: Ref
S2: 1.2 (0.6–2.4)
S3: 1.8 (1.0–3.1)
0.5 S1: Ref
S2: 0.7 (0.3–1.5)
S3: 1.6 (0.9–2.8)
0.2
0.04 0.1
Health status Ordinal variable with the following possible statuses:
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
S1: Ref
S2: 1.3 (1.0–1.7)
S3: 2.4 (2.0–2.9)
0.05 S1: Ref
S2: 1.0 (0.8–1.5)
S3: 1.5 (1.2–1.9)
0.8
< 0.001 0.002
General health compared to 1year ago Ordinal variable with the following possible statuses:
Better
About the same
Worse
S1: Ref
S2: 1.2 (1.0–1.5)
S3: 1.1 (0.9–1.4)
0.08 S1: Ref
S2: 1.3 (1.0–1.8)
S3: 1.3 (1.0–1.6)
0.04
0.3 0.06
1.

Adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, median liver stiffness measurement, depression diagnosis, cancer history

2.

Depression questionnaire variable not included as predictor in multivariate analysis

3.

NHANES National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, PHQ-9 Patient Health Questionnaire-9, S1 Controlled Attenuation Parameter Score < 248 dB/m, S2 Controlled Attenuation Parameter score 248–280 dB/m, S3 Controlled Attenuation Parameter score > 280 dB/m