Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Dec 5.
Published in final edited form as: Cell. 2023 Sep 28;186(20):4404–4421.e20. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2023.08.038

Figure 3: Neurons burdened with DSBs exhibit global disruption of the 3D genome organization at multiple scales. See also Figure S4, Table S1, pages 8–10 and 16.

Figure 3:

A) Representative immunohistochemistry images and quantification of RAD21 (cohesin subunit) in 2-week induced CK-p25 mice, comparing neurons with baseline DSBs to neurons enriched for DSBs. Representative images show dentate gyrus (left) and higher-magnification images (right). Violin plots quantify RAD21 levels between neuronal nuclei with baseline DSBs (ϒH2AX relative intensity < 1) and neurons enriched for DSBs (ϒH2AX relative intensity > 1) (Wilcoxon test). The mean relative intensity of ϒH2AX (gray) and RAD21 (red) was measured within NeuN surfaces. Control (n=5,316 cells), DSB (n=725 cells).

B) Full chromosome (chr8) Hi-C chromatin interaction heatmaps.

C) Differential heatmaps comparing Step 1/Control and Step 2/Control, colored by increased (red) or decreased (blue) interactions over control.

D) Representative Hi-C interaction plots showing the disruption of TADs. Hi-C heatmaps were rotated 45 degrees and only the upper triangle is shown.

E) Quantification of TAD disruption through Inclusion Ratio (IR). IR is the ratio of intra-TAD interactions to outside-TAD interactions (Wilcoxon test with BH correction).

F) Representative Hi-C interaction plots showing the disruption of chromatin loops.

G) Aggregate heatmaps of reduced intensity (>2-fold), increased intensity (>2-fold), and conserved (<25% change) chromatin loops for Step 1 vs. Control and Step 2 vs. Control.

H) Bar plot indicating quantification of chromatin loop disruption in Step 1 (red) and Step 2 (dark red).

I) Aggregate plots of BLISS reads centered at loop anchors in CK-p25 neurons.