Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 18;16(3):452–460. doi: 10.4103/ojo.ojo_239_22

Table 3.

Comparison of postconceptional age at which retinopathy of prematurity was first detected, retinopathy of prematurity started regressing and retinopathy of prematurity completely regressed between type 1 retinopathy of prematurity, type 2 retinopathy of prematurity and mild retinopathy of prematurity

PCA ETROP classification n Mean±SD 95% CI for mean
P
LB UB
PCA at which ROP was detected Type 1 ROP 62 34.0±2.0 33.4 34.6 0.0005*
Type 2 ROP 75 34.4±2.1 33.9 34.9
Mild ROP 28 39.1±4.2 37.3 41.0
PCA at which ROP started regressing Type 1 ROP 62 39.2±4.9 37.8 40.5 0.002*
Type 2 ROP 75 38.5±3.0 37.8 39.2
Mild ROP 28 41.9±3.6 40.3 43.5
PCA at which ROP regressed Type 1 ROP 62 53.2±6.2 51.5 54.9 0.0005*
Type 2 ROP 75 46.6±5.3 45.3 47.9
Mild ROP 28 48.3±6.6 45.4 51.3

*P<0.05 was considered significant, one-way ANOVA test. Values are presented as number, mean and SD. ROP: Retinopathy of prematurity, ETROP: Early treatment for ROP classification. PCA: Postconceptional age, SD: Standard deviation, CI: Confidence interval, LB: Lower bound, UB: Upper bound