Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Dec 5.
Published in final edited form as: Pharmacoeconomics. 2021 Aug 9;39(11):1225–1241. doi: 10.1007/s40273-021-01072-z

Table 2.

Summary of components of included cost-effectiveness analyses

Author, Year Study population Mean Age (years) Intervention Time Horizon Model Type Cost Type Effectiveness Measure Source of Health Utility Discounting
Cherry et al., 2012[22] • Children with SCD
• Had no prior history of stroke
• 2 • TCD scans followed by blood transfusion where the scan revealed a blood velocity of > 200 cm/second • Lifetime • Markov model Costs within the formal healthcare sector
• Costs of the intervention
• Costs of consequences due to the intervention
• QALY • Empirically elicited for non-SCD specific population
• Assumed by the authors without referencing empirical study.
• 3.5%
Spackman et al., 2014[23] • SCD patients
• Undergoing low- or medium-risk surgery
• 17.3 • Preoperative transfusion • 1 year • N/A Costs within the formal healthcare sector
• Costs of the intervention
• Costs of consequences due to the intervention
• QALY • Empirically elicited from SCD population
• Assumed by the authors without referencing empirical study.
• Not discounted
Arnold et al., 2015[24] • Children with SCD • Intervention: 9.10 (SD: 6.25)
• Comparator: 4.23 (SD: 3.74)
• alloHCT • 1 year
• Lifetime
• Not a modeling study Costs within the formal healthcare sector
• Costs of the intervention
• Costs of consequences due to the intervention
• QALY • Empirically elicited for SCD population
• Empirically elicited for non-SCD specific population
• Not discounted
Cunningham-Myrie et al., 2015[25] • Children with SCD
• Had a first clinical stroke
• N/A • Hydroxyurea Mean study duration
• 3.82 years for intervention group
• 4.47 years for control group
• Not a modeling study Costs within the formal healthcare sector
• Costs of the intervention
• Costs of consequences due to the intervention
• Stroke
• Death
• Utilities not used • Not discounted
Bradt et al., 2020[26] • SCD patients
• Had a baseline rate of 3 acute pain crises per year
• 24 • Voxelotor
• Crizanlizumab
• L-glutamine
Lifetime • Markov model Costs within the formal healthcare sector
• Costs of the intervention
• Costs of consequences due to the intervention
Costs within the informal health care sector
• Caregiver-time costs
Costs within the non-health care sector
• Productivity
• Education
• LY
• QALY
• evLYG
• Empirically elicited for SCD population
• Empirically elicited for non-SCD specific population
• Assumed by the authors without referencing empirical study.
• 3%
Salcedo et al., 2021[27] • Newborns with SCD • At birth • Hypothetical cell or genetic therapy • Lifetime • Markov model Costs within the formal healthcare sector
• Costs of the intervention
• Costs of consequences due to the intervention
• LY
• QALY
• Empirically elicited for SCD specific population
• Empirically elicited for non-SCD specific population
• 3%
Castilla-Rodríguez et al., 2016[28] • Newborns • At birth • Newborn screening program • 10 years • Discrete event simulation model Costs within the formal healthcare sector
• Costs of the intervention
• Costs of consequences due to the intervention
• LY • Utilities not used • 3%
Kuznik et al., 2016[29] • Newborns • At birth • Newborn screening program • Lifetime • Markov model Costs within the formal healthcare sector
• Costs of the intervention
• Costs of consequences due to the intervention
• DALY • Utilities not used • 3%
McGann et al. 2015[30] • Newborns • At birth • Newborn screening program • Lifetime • Life table Costs within the formal healthcare sector
• Costs of the intervention
• Costs of consequences due to the intervention
• HLY • Utilities not used • 3%
Bryan et al., 2011[31] • Pregnant women (biological mothers)
• Their partners (biological fathers)
• N/A • Primary care parallel
• Primary care sequential
• Pregnancy to conclusion • N/A Costs within the formal healthcare sector
• Costs of the intervention
• Costs of consequences due to the intervention
• Woman screened • Utilities not used • Not discounted
Kacker et al., 2014 (a)[32] • SCD patients
• Undergoing chronic blood transfusion
• Equivalent to mean age of the U.S. population • Prospective antigen-matching
• Perfectly informed antigen-matching
• Imperfectly informed antigen-matching
• 10 years
• 20 years
• Markov model Costs within the formal healthcare sector
• Costs of the intervention
• Costs of consequences due to the intervention
• Alloimmunization event • Utilities not used • 3%
Kacker et al., 2014 (b)[33] • SCD patients
• Undergoing chronic blood transfusion
• N/A • Prospective limited matching
• Prospective extensive matching
• 10 years
• 20 years
• Markov model Costs within the formal healthcare sector
• Costs of the intervention
• Costs of consequences due to the intervention
• Alloimmunization event • Utilities not used • 3%
McLeod et al., 2009[34] • Patients with beta-thalassemia major or SCD • Stratified by age ranging from 2 to 18+ • Deferasirox • 1 year • N/A Costs within the formal healthcare sector
• Cost of interventions
• QALY • Empirically elicited for non-SCD specific population
• Assumed by the authors without referencing empirical study
• Not discounted

alloHCT = Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation; evLYG = equal value of life year gain; DALY = disability-adjusted life year; HLY = health life year; ICER = incremental cost-effectiveness ratio; LY = life year; N/A = not available; QALY = quality-adjusted life year; SCD = sickle cell disease; SD = standard deviation; TCD = transcranial doppler ultrasound