Skip to main content
. 2023 Aug 18;16(6):540–547. doi: 10.1159/000533586

Table 2.

%EWL of the patients at the different time points after surgery

%EWL, mean±SD
Time point, month (n) RYGB OAGB LSG p value
N = 870 N = 1,381 N = 316
1 (2,567) 25.95±10.77 25.07±10.05 25.60±9.527 0.882
3 (2,552) 46.45±13.84 47.15±13.32 46.89±13.77 0.106
6 (2,538) 62.52±16.69 65.39±15.92 63.49±18.34 0.468
9 (2,516) 71.38±17.70a 76.24±17.39b 71.86±19.43a <0.001
12 (2,503) 76.40±19.18a 81.94±18.22b 73.82±21.34a <0.001
18 (2,452) 78.46±20.44a 85.79±19.12b 75.33±24.12a <0.001
24 (2,368) 77.44±20.75a 85.54±19.43b 71.60±24.31c <0.001
36 (2,129) 73.28±21.54a 82.01±21.09b 68.86±24.99a <0.001
48 (1,872) 69.44±22.28a 80.18±19.01b 60.06±25.94c <0.001
60 (1,683) 65.55±23.76a 77.60±16.95b 57.10±26.68a <0.001

%EWL, percentage of excess weight loss; RYGB, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass; OAGB, one-anastomose gastric bypass; LSG, laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.

Different letters (a, b, c) show significant differences between each pairwise surgery types, according to Tukey’s test.