Fig. 2. River networks for the three palaeogeographic scenarios.
Scenario A: excluding mountain building, including lake system dynamics; scenario B: including mountain building, excluding lake system dynamics; and scenario C: including both mountain building and lake system dynamics. In scenario A, the transcontinental west-to-east flowing Amazon River is present in all time steps, except for during the culmination of the Pebas wetlands system (15–11 Ma), when western Amazonia drained into the Pebas lake, and subsequently, into the Caribbean Sea. Scenarios B and C are identical for early time steps (80–43 Ma), before the presence of marine incursions and lakes, and very similar for 42–24 Ma, in which western Amazonia drained towards the north(west), and eastern Amazonia towards the east. Scenarios B and C start deviating substantially from 23 Ma onwards. In scenario B, the transcontinental west-to-east flowing Amazon River is established at 21 Ma. In scenario C, western Amazonia continues to drain towards the north(west) for 23–11 Ma, and only at 10 Ma, after the disappearance of the Pebas system, is the transcontinental Amazon River established. Cumulative habitat change represents the number of grid cells changing from suitable (river or lake) to unsuitable (land or marine) or vice versa. The lower panels show habitat change plotted through time (change from one time step to the next) and maps in the right panel (0 Ma) show cumulative habitat change over time per sub-basin. Absolute values are meaningless and are omitted.