Skip to main content
. 2023 Dec 5;21:160. doi: 10.1186/s43141-023-00570-1

Table 3.

Forensic efficiency parameters for 15 STR loci (1061 samples) included matching probabilities, powers of discrimination, polymorphism information content, powers of exclusion, a typical paternity index, homozygosities, and heterozygosities

MP* PD* PIC* PE* TPI* Ho* He*
D8S1179 0.052 0.948 0.80 0.619 2.64 0.189 0.811
D21S11 0.048 0.952 0.82 0.647 2.87 0.174 0.826
D7S820 0.072 0.928 0.76 0.561 2.27 0.221 0.779
CSF1PO 0.130 0.870 0.67 0.439 1.71 0.293 0.707
D3S1358 0.091 0.909 0.73 0.513 2.02 0.248 0.752
TH01 0.076 0.924 0.76 0.531 2.11 0.238 0.762
D13S317 0.790 0.921 0.75 0.570 2.32 0.216 0.784
D16S539 0.075 0.925 0.76 0.543 2.17 0.231 0.769
D2S1338 0.026 0.974 0.87 0.669 3.07 0.163 0.837
D19S433 0.045 0.955 0.82 0.629 2.72 0.184 0.816
vWA 0.068 0.932 0.77 0.520 2.05 0.244 0.456
TPOX 0.165 0.835 0.61 0.384 1.52 0.330 0.670
D18S51 0.029 0.971 0.86 0.646 2.85 0.175 0.825
D5S818 0.102 0.898 0.71 0.497 1.94 0.257 0.743
FGA 0.033 0.967 0.85 0.682 3.19 0.157 0.843
Sample size 1061 1061 1061 1061 1061 1061 1061

*MP matching probabilities, PD powers of discrimination, PIC polymorphism information content, PE powers of exclusion, TPI typical paternity index, Ho homozygosities, and He heterozygosities