Table 1.
Assessment of accuracy, tooth structure loss, and success rate on RCT or retreatment by different DGT methods ex vivo
| Order | Authors | Samples | Method | Mean linear deviation/mm | Mean angular deviation/° | Substance Loss/mm3 | Success rate/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Buchgreitz J, et al.126 | 48 teeth mounted in acrylic blocks | SGE | <0.7 mm | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| 2 | Zehnder MS, et al.14 | 60 single rooted teeth in maxillary models | SGE |
mesial/distal (base) 0.21 buccal/palatal(base) 0.2 apical/coronal(base) 0.16 mesial/distal (tip) 0.29 buccal/palatal (tip) 0.47 apical/coronal (tip) 0.17 |
1.81 | N/A | 100 |
| 3 | Connert T, et al.34 | 60 anterior teeth in mandibular models | SGE |
mesial/distal (base) 0.12 buccal/oral (base) 0.13 apical/coronal(base) 0.12 mesial/distal (tip) 0.14 buccal/oral (tip) 0.34 apical/coronal (tip) 0.12 |
1.59 | N/A | 100 |
| 4 | Zhang C, et al.105 | 40 single-rooted premolars in epoxy model | SGE |
mesial/distal (base) 0.28 buccal/lingual (base) 0.25 mesial/distal (tip) 0.30 buccal/lingual (tip) 0.28 |
3.62 | N/A | 100 |
| 5 | Su Y, et al.103 | 36 anterior teeth, 24 premolars, and 24 molars in maxillary and mandible models | SGE |
anterior (base) 0.09 premolar (base) 0.07 molar (base) 0.22 anterior (tip) 0.28 premolar (tip) 0.40 molar (tip) 0.64 |
anterior 1.73 premolar 2.23 molar 4.00 |
N/A | 71.8 |
| 6 | Connert T, et al.99 | 48 printed incisors with calcified canals | SGE | N/A | N/A | 9.8 | 91.7 |
| FH | 49.9* | 41.7* | |||||
| 7 | Loureiro MAZ, et al.127 | 20 mandibular incisors and upper molars | SGE | N/A | N/A |
incisor 26.5 molar 45.7 |
N/A |
| FH |
incisor 31.7 molar 62.5* |
||||||
| 8 | Kostunov J, et al.98 | typodont teeth with 30 canals in acrylic resin model | SGE | N/A | N/A |
incisor 10.3 premolar 29.3 molar 51.8 |
N/A |
| FH |
incisor 16.1* premolar 44.2* molar 99.3* |
||||||
| 9 | Jain SD, et al.101 | 84 printed teeth with calcified canals in maxillary and mandibular models | DGE (Navident) |
anterior (base) 1.0 premolar (base) 1.2 molar (base) 1.0 anterior (tip) 1.3 premolar (tip) 1.1 molar (tip) 1.4 |
anterior 1.53 premolar 1.38 molar 1.89 |
N/A | 100 |
| 10 | Torres A, et al.128 | 132 printed teeth with calcified canals in maxillary or mandibular models | DGE (Navident) |
anterior 1.77 premolar 1.54 molar 1.37 |
anterior 2.68 premolar 2.73 molar 3.01 |
N/A | 93 |
| 11 | Gambarini G, et al.104 | 132 artificial teeth in silicon bases | DGE (Navident) | 0.34 | 4.8 | N/A | N/A |
| FH | 0.88^ | 21.2^ | |||||
| 12 | Dianat O, et al.129 | 60 single-rooted teeth with calcified canals in cadaver jaws |
DGE (X-guide) |
mesial/distal 0.12 buccal/lingual 0.19 |
2.39 | N/A | 96.6 |
| FH |
mesial/distal 0.31^ buccal/lingual 0.81^ |
7.25^ | 83.3 | ||||
| 13 | Jain SD, et al.102 | 40 3D printed teeth with calcified canals in maxillary or mandibular models | DGE (Navident) | N/A | N/A |
Maxilla 35.5 Mandible 19.0 |
90 |
| FH |
Maxilla 62.2^ Mandible 19.1 |
85 | |||||
| 14 | Connert T, et al.100 | 72 typodont teeth on models | DGE (DENACAM) | N/A | N/A | 10.5 | 97.2 |
| FH | 29.7^ | 97.2 | |||||
| 15 | Zubizarreta-Macho Á, et al.130 | 30 single rooted anterior teeth in epoxy resin models | SGE |
base 7.44 tip 7.13 |
10.04 | N/A | N/A |
| DGE (Navident) |
base 3.14 tip 2.48 |
5.58 | |||||
| FH |
base 4.03*^ tip 2.43*^ |
14.95*^ | |||||
| 16 | Ali A, et al.66 | 30 mandibular premolars with MTA placement at 3 mm below CEJ | SGE | N/A | N/A | N/A | 100% |
| FH | 86.7%* | ||||||
| 17 | Perez C, et al.63 | 40 teeth with RCT, fiber posts, and composite build-ups | SGE |
mesial/distal (coronal) 0.28 buccal/oral (coronal) 0.23 global (coronal) 0.39 mesial/distal (apical) 0.26 buccal/oral (apical) 0.24 global (apical) 0.40 |
N/A | N/A | 87.5% |
| FH | |||||||
| 18 | Janabi A, et al.62 | 26 maxillary teeth with RCT, fiber posts, and core build-ups |
DGE (X-guide) |
global (coronal) 0.91 global (apical) 1.17 |
1.75 | 54.63 | N/A |
| FH |
global (coronal) 1.13* global (apical) 1.68* |
4.49 | 38.18 |
SGE static guided endodontics, DGE dynamic guided endodontics, FH freehand, MTA mineral trioxide aggregate, CEJ cementoenamel junction, *P < 0.05 as compared to SGE, ^P < 0.05 as compared to DGE