Skip to main content
. 2023 Aug 10;37(18):3854–3860. doi: 10.1038/s41433-023-02665-y

Table 2.

The proportion of operations under each remuneration method that used each IOL with individual IOL posterior capsular opacification (PCO) rates.

Remuneration method – percentage of operations for each IOL (column %) PCO rates at (%)
IOL model IOL material Number of operations for each IOL Number of centres that used the IOL BC (N = 240,641) PbR (N = 456,198) Both (N = 210,213) 1 year 3 years 5 years
Tecnis ZCB00 Hydrophobic 240,691 52 33.6 29.7 11.6 3.7 13.5 26.5
AcrySof IQ SN60WF Hydrophobic 170,590 39 42.5 9.4 12.0 2.3 8.2 16.6
Akreos Adapt Hydrophilic 149,460 40 0.8 22.4 21.6 6.2 38.7 56.3
Hoya ISERT Hydrophobic 77,242 20 3.6 12.1 6.4 3.8 13.9 30.4
Rayner Hydrophilic Hydrophilic 69,176 41 2.7 4.8 19.4 6.0 26.8 44.5
EYECEE ONE Hydrophobic 67,954 29 11.6 1.9 15.0 4.7 15.4 26.0
AcrySof SA60AT Hydrophobic 54,765 39 1.7 10.1 2.1 3.3 9.7 19.4
Lenstac Softec Hydrophilic 29,466 17 <0.1 5.4 2.4 5.8 27.7 46.7
Zeiss CT Lucia Hydrophobic 28,013 22 1.6 2.4 6.4 2.2 17.0 46.6
B & L Envista MX60 Hydrophobic 11,378 13 1.8 0.2 3.0 4.1 21.5 45.4
B & L Incise Hydrophilic 7552 4 <0.1 1.6 0.1 5.1 18.6 31.3
Physiol A123 Hydrophilic 765 4 0.0 0.1 <0.1 6.0 45.5 64.8

BC block contract, PbR payment by results.