Table 6.
Quality assessment results
| Study | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Q5 | Q6 | Q7 | Q8 | Q9 | Total | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Charfeddine and Khediri (2016) | 1 | 1 | 0.5 | 1 | 0.5 | 1 | 1 | 0.5 | 1 | 7.5 | 83% |
| Kahouli et al. (2021) | 1 | 1 | 0.5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8.5 | 94% |
| Serener et al. (2022) | 0.5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 89% |
| Shahbaz et al. (2018) | 0.5 | 1 | 0.5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 89% |
| Shahbaz et al. (2020) | 0.5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.5 | 8 | 89% |
| Aljadani (2022) | 0.5 | 1 | 0.5 | 1 | 1 | 0.5 | 1 | 1 | 0.5 | 7 | 78% |
| Xu et al. (2018) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 7.5 | 83% |
| Villanthenkodath and Arakkal (2020) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8.5 | 94% |
| Shahbaz et al. (2020a) | 0.5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8.5 | 94% |
| Raggad (2020) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.5 | 1 | 0.5 | 8 | 89% |
| Awosusi et al. (2022) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8.5 | 94% |
| Alam et al. (2022) | 0.5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8.5 | 94% |
| Shahbaz et al. (2013) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.5 | 8.5 | 94% |
| Godil et al. (2020) | 1 | 1 | 0.5 | 1 | 0.5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 89% |
| Khan et al. (2021) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.5 | 8 | 89% |
| Rjoub et al. (2021) | 1 | 0.5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.5 | 1 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 7 | 78% |
| Adebayo et al. (2021) | 0.5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8.5 | 94% |
| Cetin et al. (2018) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8.5 | 94% |
| Ozturk and Acaravci (2013) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1 | 8 | 89% |
| Katircioğlu and Taşpinar (2017) | 1 | 1 | 0.5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.5 | 8 | 89% |
The scoring procedure involved allocating points to each question based on a three-point scale: a response of “Yes” was given a value of 1, a response of “No” was assigned a value of 0, and a response of “Partially” was assigned a value of 0.5