Table 2.

Characteristics of nine patients with minimum 2-year follow-up after RTSA

Patient No.	Age (yr)	Sex	Follow-up (mo)	Prior arthroplasty	Presence of implants	Indication for surgery	Defect classification
1	78.0	F	60	2	Hemiarthroplasty	Failed RTSA	Antuna, severe combined central and posterior
2	68.6	M	51	2	Hemiarthroplasty	Failed TSA	Antuna, severe combined central and anterior
3	65.2	F	48	0	None	Dislocation arthropathy	Walch, A2
4	80.3	F	24	0	None	Chronic anterior fracture dislocation	Walch, D
5	80.1	M	42	0	None	Cuff tear arthropathy	Favard E3; Walch A2; Hamada IIB; Frankle superior erosion
6	74.5	F	40	0	None	Degenerative arthritis	Walch, C
7	71.4	M	30	3	Hemiarthroplasty	Failed TSA	Antuna, severe combined anterior, central, and posterior
8	72.3	M	31	4	Antibiotic cement spacer	Infected RTSA	Antuna, severe combined anterior, central, and posterior
9	78.3	F	27	0	None	Cuff tear arthropathy	Favard E1; Walch D; Hamada IIB; Frankle anterior erosion

RTSA: reverse total shoulder arthroplasty, TSA: anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty.