Skip to main content
. 2023 Aug 18;26(4):416–422. doi: 10.5397/cise.2022.01403

Table 4.

Unadjusted effects of patient predictors on false screening alarms

Variable False screening alarm due to shoulder arthroplasty
OR (95% CI) P-value*
Yes No
No. (%) 53 (62) 33 (38) - -
Sex 0.60 (0.25–1.49) 0.27
 Female 29 (55) 22 (67)
 Male (Ref) 24 (45) 11 (33)
Type of shoulder arthroplasty 1.09 (0.45–2.66) 0.85
 Total 25 (47) 16 (48)
 Reverse (Ref) 28 (53) 17 (52)
Other metal implants 5.87 (2.18–15.82) <0.01
 Yes 44 (83) 15 (45)
 No (Ref) 9 (17) 18 (55)
International flights following shoulder arthroplasty 1.26 (0.49–3.21) 0.64
 Yes 19 (36) 9 (27)
 No (Ref) 34 (64) 24 (73)
TSA pre-check use following shoulder arthroplasty 1.48 (0.61–3.58) 0.38
 Yes 26 (49) 13 (39)
 No (Ref) 27 (51) 20 (61)
Advised that implant might set off airport alarms 1.22 (0.45–3.30) 0.69
 Yes 15 (33) 9 (29)
 No (Ref) 30 (67) 22 (71)
Physician note regarding metal implants 1.64 (0.52–5.17) 0.40
 Yes 12 (23) 5 (15)
 No (Ref) 41 (77) 28 (85)
Age (yr) 67.16±8.87 69.39±11.68 0.89 (0.71–1.12) 0.32
Body mass index (kg/m2) 32.14±6.11 30.71±6.10 1.22 (0.84–1.77) 0.30

Values are presented as number (%) or mean±standard deviation. Frequencies and column percentages are reported to describe the bivariate associations between patient demographic, orthopedic, and travel predictors and false airport screening alarms due to arthroplasty. Predictors were based upon “yes” or “no” responses, rather than total.

OR: odds ratio, CI: confidence interval, Ref: reference.

*

Fisher's exact test P-value, significance defined as less than 0.05;

Incomplete data due to lack of survey response;

Per 5-unit increase.