Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 May 16.
Published in final edited form as: N Engl J Med. 2023 Oct 21;389(20):1839–1850. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2309457

Table 2.

Summary of End Points Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review.*

End Point Intention-to-Treat–Pembrolizumab Population Overall Intention-to-Treat Population
Selpercatinib (N = 129) Control (N = 83) Selpercatinib (N = 159) Control (N=102)
Progression-free survival — mo
 Median progression-free survival (95% CI) 24.8 (16.9–NE) 11.2 (8.8–16.8) 24.8 (17.3–NE) 11.2 (8.8–16.8)
 Median duration of follow-up (95% CI) 19.4 (16.7–19.7) 18.9 (14.2–22.3) 19.4 (16.7–19.6) 16.5 (13.6–21.0)
Objective response (95% CI) — % of patients 84 (76–90) 65 (54–75) 84 (77–89) 63 (53–72)
Best overall response — no. (%)
 Complete response 9 (7) 5 (6) 12 (8) 5 (5)
 Partial response 99 (77) 49 (59) 121 (76) 59 (58)
 Stable disease 14 (11) 20 (24) 17 (11) 26 (25)
 Progressive disease 2 (2) 5 (6) 2 (1) 7 (7)
 Not evaluable 5 (4) 4 (5) 7 (4) 5 (5)
Duration of response
 Patients with a response — no. 108 54 133 64
 Patients with a response and censored data — no. (%) 74 (69) 25 (46) 43 (32) 31 (48)
 Median duration of response (95% CI) — mo 24.2 (17.9–NE) 11.5 (9.7–23.3) 24.2 (17.9–NE) 12.0 (9.7–23.3)
 Median duration of follow-up (95% CI) — mo 18.0 (16.5–19.5) 14.6 (11.2–19.8) 17.9 (15.7–18.7) 12.7 (11.1–16.6)
*

Percentages may not total 100 because of rounding. Confidence intervals have not been adjusted for multiplicity and cannot be used to infer treatment effects. Efficacy outcomes were assessed with the use of Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), version 1.1, and were confirmed by blinded independent radiologic review. NE denotes not estimable.