Skip to main content
. 2023 Nov 30;6(1):100830. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2023.100830

Table 2.

Diagnostic values of Bear Hug Test, Belly Press Test, and Test of Combination for Detecting Subscapularis Tears

Bear Hug Belly Press Test Combination Cohen Kappa, P Value
Sensitivity 46.1% (399/866) 23.3% (202/866) 46.7% (404/866) <.001
Specificity 83.2% (213/256) 93.4% (239/256) 81.6% (209/256) <.001
Positive predictive value 90.3% (399/442) 92.2% (202/219) 89.6% (404/451) <.001
Negative predictive value 31.3% (213/680) 26.5% (239/903) 31.1% (209/671) <.001
Accuracy 54.5% (612/1122) 39.3% (441/1122) 54.6% (613/1122) <.001
False-positive rate 16.8% (n = 43) 6.6% (n = 17) 18.4% (n = 47)
False-negative rate 53.9% (n = 467) 76.7% (n = 664) 53.3% (n = 462)
AUROC curve 0.646 (95% Cl 0.610-0.682) 0.583 (95% Cl 0.546-0.620) 0.641 (95% Cl 0.605-0.678)

NOTE. Test of combination versus bear hug test versus belly press test Cochran’s Q test 282.04, P < .001. Pairwise comparisons: test of combination versus bear hug test, P = .478; test of combination versus belly press test, P < .001; bear hug test versus belly press test, P < .001.

AUROC, area under the receiving characteristic curve; CI, confidence interval.

Bear hug test versus belly press test Cohen’s kappa value: 0.51 is substantial. T = 19.07, P < .001.

Arthroscopic diagnosis versus bear hug test Cohen kappa value: 0.19 is slight. T = 8.42, P < .001.

Arthroscopic diagnosis versus belly press test Cohen’s kappa value: 0.09 is slight. T = 5.91, P < .001.