Skip to main content
. 2023 Nov 8;8(Suppl 5):2–25. doi: 10.25646/11730

Annex Table 5.

Age-standardised incidence of type 1 and type 2 diabetes stratified by regional socioeconomic deprivation, sex and reporting year (n per year: Annex Table 3)

Source: InGef Research Database; GISD Release 2022 v0.1

Female Male Total
2019 2020 2021 2019 2020 2021 2019 2020 2021
Type 1 diabetes (New cases per 100,000 (95 % CI))
  < 18 years
    Low 25.7 (23.6 – 28.1) 25.8 (23.6 – 28.1) 28.5 (26.2 – 30.9) 27.4 (25.3 – 29.8) 32.4 (30.1 – 35.0) 36.5 (34.0 – 39.2) 26.6 (25.1 – 28.3) 29.2 (27.6 – 30.9) 32.6 (30.9 – 34.4)
    Medium 20.5 (19.1 – 21.9) 27.2 (25.7 – 28.9) 27.7 (26.1 – 29.4) 26.5 (25.0 – 28.1) 34.7 (33.0 – 36.5) 32.4 (30.8 – 34.2) 23.6 (22.6 – 24.7) 31.1 (29.9 – 32.3) 30.2 (29.0 – 31.4)
    High 43.0 (38.6 – 47.8) 50.1 (45.4 – 55.3) 52.5 (47.7 – 57.8) 36.2 (32.3 – 40.5) 49.5 (45.0 – 54.5) 53.6 (48.9 – 58.8) 39.5 (36.6 – 42.7) 49.8 (46.5 – 53.3) 53.1 (49.7 – 56.8)
  ≥ 18 years
    Low 4.1 (3.7 – 4.5) 4.7 (4.2 – 5.1) 6.4 (5.9 – 7.0) 8.2 (7.6 – 8.9) 7.1 (6.6 – 7.8) 6.7 (6.2 – 7.3) 6.1 (5.7 – 6.5) 5.9 (5.5 – 6.2) 6.6 (6.2 – 7.0)
    Medium 5.5 (5.2 – 5.9) 5.7 (5.4 – 6.1) 5.2 (4.9 – 5.6) 8.4 (7.9 – 8.8) 8.8 (8.4 – 9.3) 7.9 (7.5 – 8.4) 6.9 (6.6 – 7.2) 7.2 (7.0 – 7.5) 6.5 (6.3 – 6.8)
    High 4.5 (3.9 – 5.2) 6.6 (5.9 – 7.4) 4.5 (3.9 – 5.2) 10.2 (9.2 – 11.2) 8.5 (7.6 – 9.5) 10.1 (9.2 – 11.2) 7.3 (6.7 – 7.9) 7.5 (7.0 – 8.2) 7.3 (6.7 – 7.9)
Type 2 diabetes (% (95 % CI))
    Low 0.58 (0.58 – 0.58) 0.53 (0.53 – 0.53) 0.61 (0.61 – 0.61) 0.71 (0.71 – 0.71) 0.64 (0.64 – 0.65) 0.73 (0.73 – 0.73) 0.65 (0.65 – 0.65) 0.59 (0.59 – 0.59) 0.67 (0.67 – 0.67)
    Medium 0.64 (0.64 – 0.64) 0.57 (0.57 – 0.57) 0.67 (0.67 – 0.67) 0.78 (0.78 – 0.78) 0.71 (0.71 – 0.71) 0.83 (0.83 – 0.83) 0.71 (0.71 – 0.71) 0.64 (0.64 – 0.64) 0.75 (0.75 – 0.75)
    High 0.71 (0.71 – 0.71) 0.65 (0.65 – 0.65) 0.82 (0.82 – 0.82) 0.90 (0.90 – 0.90) 0.79 (0.79 – 0.79) 0.93 (0.93 – 0.93) 0.80 (0.80 – 0.80) 0.72 (0.72 – 0.72) 0.87 (0.87 – 0.87)

low = 20 % of the districts with the lowest deprivation, medium = 60 % of the districts with medium deprivation, high = 20 % of the districts with the highest deprivation